· Private foundation
Clark L Tanner Foundation
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $130k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF CAL AT SAN FRANCISCO | $300,000 |
| ALLIANCE HOUSE | $60,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S CENTER | $55,000 |
| UNIVESITY OF UTAH | $45,000 |
| UNIVESITY OF UTAH | $25,000 |
| NAMI - COLORADO | $20,000 |
| MIND RESEARCH NETWORK | $20,000 |
| SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| UTAH SYMPHONY | $10,000 |
| CLASSICS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION | $7,772 |
| ABLE DIFFERENTLY | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +113% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $338k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHALLIANCE HOUSE INC3× · 2020–2022 · $390k · revenue +304%
- USUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA2× · 2021–2022 · $310k · revenue +6%
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH3× · 2020–2022 · $305k · revenue +113%
Funded once
- EPEL PASO COMMUNITY FUNDone grant, 2021 · $50k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $20k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CAL - SAN FRANCISCOone grant, 2021 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The center for mental health partners with people and communities to produce exceptional mental health and substance abuse services.
Santa fe pro musica brings together outstanding musicians to inspire and educate audiences of all ages through the performance of great music.
To make a meaningful difference through healthcare innovation and caring for the whole person.
The mission of the Tucson Symphony is to build and enrich community through the experience of live music of the highest quality.
Ulps exists to support the missions of university of tennessee health science center and le bonheur children's hospital to provide high quality patient care, education, research and advocacy. ulps will collaborate with patients and their…
The Utah Chamber Artists (UCA) is a world renowned, not-for-profit organization founded in 1991 to provide audiences with an artistic force that provides a wide variety of music of the highest caliber, presented in the finest manner. UCA…
The institute of contemporary psychoanalysis was formed in 1990 to offer mental health professionals, as well as scholars and professionals from other fields, the opportunity to study the full scope of psychoanalytic theory and clinical…
Education of professionals and general public. our mission is to promote excellence in psychiatric care through advocacy, education and research.
As part of intermountain health, mount saint vincent partners with children and families to heal beyond trauma into a healthy and hopeful future.
Bring together world-class musicians from across North America for classical and innovative musicalprograms and ensure the preservation andappreciation of classical music by giving young musicians the opportunity to learn and perform…
Nami idaho works to improve the quality of life for all those affected by mental illness through support, education, advocacy and research.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Mental Health Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Classics for Kids Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK ↗
- Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH ↗
- Who funds NAMI COLORADO ↗
- Who funds VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CLASSICS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY ORCHESTRA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Clark L Tanner Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Clark L Tanner Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Clark L Tanner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.