Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ckko Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$386k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$760kHealth$662kArts & Culture$411kFood & Nutrition$296kHuman Services$210kEducation$164kPhilanthropy$89kReligion$88kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $241k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$60,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY FOOD BANK$50,000
SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$30,000
SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH & RESOURCE CENTER$30,000
REFUGEE SUPPORT SERVICE INC$20,000
WILD AT HEART INC$15,000
DESERT SOUNDS PERFORMING ARTS INC$12,000
ARIZONA RECREATION CENTER FOR THE HANDICAPPED$12,000
CHARLOTTE SYMPHONY$12,000
SOLDIER'S BEST FRIEND$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF CHARLOTTE$10,000
STAND FOR ANIMALS VET CLINIC$10,000
PHOENIX CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC$10,000
A CURE IN OUR LIFETIME CO JENNIFER FINK$10,000
YOUNG JUDEA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $5k → 6%AMERICAN MOBILITY PROJECT: $10k → 9%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $5k → 6%AMERICAN MOBILITY PROJECT: $10k → 9%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $5k → 8%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $5k → 6%AMERICAN MOBILITY PROJECT: $10k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $5k → 14%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $5k → 6%MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ATLANTA: $5k → 14%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $5k → 6%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $5k → 14%SINGLETON MOMS: $8k → 11%THE SINGLETONS: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
RI
CA
KY
AZ
TN
NC
LA
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 44 repeat orgs$205k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
14

Total granted

$2.7M
$168k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+30%

Still filing today

59%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SW
    SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $250k · revenue +72% · 46% of their budget
  • SA
    SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $212k · revenue +138%
  • TF
    THE FELICIA PENZELL WEBER JEWISH COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $110k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • KT
    KSR TORNADO RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $80k
  • AA
    ANSWER ALSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +30%
  • AT
    ALLIANCE THEATER
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Statewide Independent Living Council

Arizona Statewide Independent Living Council, AZSILC is one of 56 Statewide Independent Living Councils, SILCs which are federally mandated under the Rehabilitation Act. There is one SILC in each state and US territory. AZSILC members are…

Human Services
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
4
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
5
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
6
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
7
Teamability Inc

Teamability strives to ensure that children with severe multiple disabilities have the opportunity to benefit from therapeautic educational intervention to participate actively in life.

Education
8
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

SRAlab is dedicated to providing the best patient outcomes through the highest-quality clinical care, translational research, scientific discovery and education.

Health
11
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
12
The N 1 Collaborative Inc

To make individualized medicines routinely and rapidly accessible to rare disease patients worldwide.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Horses Help Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Los Nios Primero Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/38
Grantees still filing
24/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY FOOD BANK: $296,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY FOOD BANKSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATIONALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION OF THE SOUTHWEST: $140,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION OF THE SOUTHWESTCHARLOTTE SYMPHONY: $106,000 · OtherCHARLOTTE SYMPHONYARCH: $94,000 · OtherARCHSTAND FOR ANIMALS VET CLINIC: $80,000 · OtherKSR TORNADO RELIEF FUND: $80,000 · OtherPHOENIX ZOO: $80,000 · OtherTEMPLE SINAI INC: $77,500 · OtherREFUGEE SUPPORT SERVICE INC: $60,000 · OtherHORSES HELP FOUNDATION: $59,000 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Other+23 more: $335,500 · Other+23 moreSOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER: $212,000 · HealthSOUTHWEST AU…A Cure in Our Lifetime Inc: $30,000 · HealthA Cure in Ou…AID ATLANTA INC: $25,000 · HealthAID ATLANTA …ANSWER ALS: $20,000 · HealthANSWER ALSTHE OVARIAN CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $18,000 · HealthTHE OVARIAN …Therapeutic Harp Foundation: $15,000 · Health+2 more: $15,000 · HealthDESERT SOUNDS PERFORMING ARTS INC: $88,000 · Arts & CultureDESERT SO…PHOENIX CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $70,000 · Arts & CulturePHOENIX C…MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $45,000 · Arts & CultureMUSICAL I…CHARLOTTE BALLET: $30,000 · Arts & CultureCHARLOTTE…WILD AT HEART INC: $105,000 · AnimalsHumane Society of Charlotte Inc: $90,000 · AnimalsLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Animals+1 more: $5,000 · AnimalsSOLDIERS BEST FRIEND: $86,000 · Human ServicesBOUNTIFUL AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC DBA AMERICAN MOBILITY PROJECT: $30,000 · Human ServicesISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE SINGLETONS: $16,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesDETOUR COMPANY THEATER INC: $8,000 · Human Services+2 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE FELICIA PENZELL WEBER JEWISH COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL INC: $110,000 · EducationYOUNG JUDAEA GLOBAL INC: $40,000 · EducationGibbon Conservation Center: $85,000 · Youth DevelopmentLOS NIOS PRIMERO INC: $9,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,718,000Health$335,000Arts & Culture$233,000Animals$210,000Human Services$185,000Education$150,000Youth Development$94,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 9y, 46% of budgetSOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER: $212,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FELICIA PENZELL WEBER JEWISH COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL INC: $110,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWILD AT HEART INC: $105,000 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetHumane Society of Charlotte Inc: $90,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetDESERT SOUNDS PERFORMING ARTS INC: $88,000 over 9y, 11% of budgetSOLDIERS BEST FRIEND: $86,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetGibbon Conservation Center: $85,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetPHOENIX CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $70,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORSES HELP FOUNDATION: $59,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG JUDAEA GLOBAL INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetA Cure in Our Lifetime Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetBOUNTIFUL AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC DBA AMERICAN MOBILITY PROJECT: $30,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetCHARLOTTE BALLET: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEYLIFE: $28,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAID ATLANTA INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetANSWER ALS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SINGLETONS: $16,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTherapeutic Harp Foundation: $15,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetArizona Recreation Center for the Handicapped: $12,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE RHODE ISLAND FREE CLINIC INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMELESS ID PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS NIOS PRIMERO INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDETOUR COMPANY THEATER INC: $8,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598): $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ATLANTA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpay Neuter Charlotte: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE FELICIA PENZELL WEBER JEWISH COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD AT HEART INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Charlotte Inc ↗
  • Who funds DESERT SOUNDS PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOLDIERS BEST FRIEND ↗
  • Who funds Gibbon Conservation Center ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HORSES HELP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG JUDAEA GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds A Cure in Our Lifetime Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOUNTIFUL AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC DBA AMERICAN MOBILITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE BALLET ↗
  • Who funds VALLEYLIFE ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds AID ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds ANSWER ALS ↗
  • Who funds THE OVARIAN CANCER INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SINGLETONS ↗
  • Who funds Therapeutic Harp Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Recreation Center for the Handicapped ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ24.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · American Express Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · John F Long Foundation Inc · The Molly Lawson Foundation · The Bryan and Amy Lewis Family Foundation Inc · Halpern-Oppenheimer Family Foundation · Rosenberg Family Foundation Inc · The Selig Foundation Inc · Ron and Lisa Brill Charitable Trust · Fiesta Events Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ckko Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ckko Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ckko’s filings →

    More from the funding graph