Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cielo Azul Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$116k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0171% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$428kHuman Services$206kYouth Development$40kArts & Culture$20kEducation$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kFood & Nutrition$5kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DR MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER$110,000
UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND$5,000
IMPACT 100 NEWPORT CO$1,145
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GEN AUSTIN: $40k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$665k · 6 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
12

Total granted

$665k
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+32%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER INCORPORATED
    4× · 2022–2025 · $428k · revenue -43%
  • MC
    MLK COMMUNITY CENTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $206k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2020–2022 · $23k

Funded once

  • G
    GENAUSTINgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +32%
  • AT
    AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +235%
  • OH
    OLIVER HAZARD PERRY RHODE ISLAND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +711%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Alumni Association of the University of Rhode Island

The university of rhode island alumni association informs and engages current and future alumni as committed partners of the university, its missions and traditions.

—
2
Aquidneck Island Planning Commission

Aipc works to preserve and improve the environment, economy and quality of life on aquidneck island to ensure that the island remains a great place to live, work, play and thrive.

Community Improvement
3
Newport String Project

The newport string project is a chamber music performance and youth mentoring initiative committed to making inspiring musical experiences accessible for all in newport, ri. string instrument lessons are provided free of charge to students…

Arts & Culture
4
Rhode Island Marine Trade Association

Rimta's mission is to champion the rhode island marine industry through advocacy, education, environmental stewardship, innovation and promotion.

—
5
Gloucester Marine Genomics Institute Incorporated

Gloucester marine genomics institute's mission is to address critical challenges in ocean health, human health, and the environment through innovative marine biotechnology research and transformative science education. by combining…

Science & Tech
6
Newport Community School

Newport community school provides educational opportunities to complement classroom learning and support academic success, personal responsibility and economic self-sufficiency in a vibrant engaged commmunity.

Education
7
Newport Community Trust
Philanthropy
8
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
9
Nantucket Arts Council Inc

Support and encourage a collaborative community of the visual, performing and literary arts through education, grants, scholarships and events.

Arts & Culture
10
Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound Inc

The alliance to protect nantucket sound is a 501(c)(3) non-profit environmental organization dedicated to the permanent preservation of nantucket sound, the historic body of water that lies between cape cod, martha's vineyard, and…

Environment
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Trinity Academy for the Performing Arts

Trinity academy for the performing arts utilizes an interdisciplinary arts-integrated program to prepare our artist-scholars for collegiate and professional success.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Martin Luther King Community Center Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Genaustin. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER INCORPORATED: $427,668 · Recreation & SportsMARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER INCORPORATEDMLK COMMUNITY CENTER: $206,050 · OtherMLK COMMUNITY CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $22,644 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+10 more: $20,897 · Other+10 moreGENAUSTIN: $40,000 · Human ServicesAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureOLIVER HAZARD PERRY RHODE ISLAND INC: $8,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $288 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT: $6,000 · EducationWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,222 · InternationalAQUIDNECK COMMUNITY TABLE: $5,000 · Environment
Recreation & Sports$427,668Other$249,591Human Services$40,000Arts & Culture$18,288Education$6,000International$5,222Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER INCORPORATED: $427,668 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetGENAUSTIN: $40,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOLIVER HAZARD PERRY RHODE ISLAND INC: $8,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,222 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAQUIDNECK COMMUNITY TABLE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNEWPORT SINGS: $288 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds GENAUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds OLIVER HAZARD PERRY RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds AQUIDNECK COMMUNITY TABLE ↗
  • Who funds NEWPORT SINGS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cielo Azul Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cielo Azul Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cielo Azul Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cielo Azul Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cielo Azul’s filings →

    More from the funding graph