Skip to content

· Public charity

Ci Foundation Inc

To spread the word on philanthropy and support local and national programs that focus on childrens intiatives in need of financial assistance and logistical support wihtin the south florida community.

$84k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$467kPhilanthropy$26kYouth Development$19kEducation$10kRecreation & Sports$3k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$34,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$54k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRANQUIL SHORES NPC INC$40,000
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$34,000
FFMD FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TRANQUIL SHORES NPC INC: $40k → 12%TRANQUIL SHORES NPC INC: $40k → 12%TRANQUIL SHORES NPC INC: $40k → 12%TRANQUIL SHORES NPC INC: $30k → 12%TRANQUIL SHORES NPC INC: $30k → 12%TRANQUIL SHORES NPC INC: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$441k · 7 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$441k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-33%
+41%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    TRANQUIL SHORES NPC INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue -92% · 72% of their budget
  • AL
    AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $120k · revenue +175%
  • CC
    CHILDRENS CANCER CARING CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $55k

Funded once

  • WW
    WALKING WITH ANTHONYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue +41%
  • GM
    GREASTER MIAMI BILLFISH TOURNAMENT
    4× · 2022–2025 · $3k
  • TD
    THE DEERING ESTATE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assoc Tennessee Chapter

The amyotrophic lateral sclerosis association's mission is to raise money to assist in finding a cure for als and to improve the lifestyle of those who have als.

—
2
Answer Als

To find solutions for people living with als now and for the future by utilizing knowledge of patients, leading researchers and technology to seek immediate solutions to improve the lives of those living with als until a treatment or cure…

Health
3
The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association St Louis Regional Chapter

To discover treatments and a cure for als, and to serve, advocate for, and empower people affected by als to live their lives to the fullest.

—
4
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
5
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Associatio Evergreen Chapter

Leading the fight to treat and cure ALS through global research and nationwide advocacy while also empowering people with Lou Gehrig's disease and their families to live fuller lives by providing them with compassionate care and support.

—
6
Als Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Augies Quest to Cure Als Inc

Founded by Augie Nieto, Augies Quest to Cure ALS is the unwavering force driving breakthroughs in ALS research, defying limitations, and empowering hope for a future without this devastating disease.

Health
8
Cure ADSSL1

To find cure for adssl1 and offer hope and provide a brighter future to children affected with adenylosuccinate lyase (adsl) deficiency

Health
9
Curepsp Inc

To raise awareness, build community, improve care and find a cure for psp, cbd and msa.

Health
10
Mario a Finnell Als Foundation

The mission is to empower people living with als and their families by providing aids for daily living, to support people living with als and their families through group therapy, and to raise awareness for this debilitating disease…

—
11
World Free of Als Inc
Health
12
Als One Inc

The organization is a partnership of world leaders in als research and care focused on expediting breakthrough treatments and ultimately a cure for als while providing resources and equipment to those living with the disease now. the team…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fishing for Md Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRANQUIL SHORES NPC INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesTRANQUIL SHORES NPC INCAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $119,900 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATIONWALKING WITH ANTHONY: $44,500 · HealthWALKING WITH ANTHONYFISHING FOR MD FOUNDATION INC: $18,500 · HealthFISHING FOR MD FOUNDATION INCCHILDRENS CANCER CARING CENTER: $55,000 · OtherCHILDRENS CANCER CARI…ALS RECOVERY FUND: $18,869 · OtherALS RECOVERY FUNDCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF MIAMI INC: $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL…FFMD FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherFFMD FOUNDATION+2 more: $4,500 · OtherUNITED WAY MIAMI INC: $24,398 · PhilanthropyRUSSELL LIFE SKILLS AND READING FOUNDATION INC: $18,500 · Youth Development
Human Services$200,000Health$182,900Other$98,369Philanthropy$24,398Youth Development$18,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRANQUIL SHORES NPC INC: $200,000 over 9y, 72% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $119,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWALKING WITH ANTHONY: $44,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetUNITED WAY MIAMI INC: $24,398 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetALS RECOVERY FUND: $18,869 over 9y, 11% of budgetFISHING FOR MD FOUNDATION INC: $18,500 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetRUSSELL LIFE SKILLS AND READING FOUNDATION INC: $18,500 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF MIAMI INC: $10,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRANQUIL SHORES NPC INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WALKING WITH ANTHONY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds ALS RECOVERY FUND ↗
  • Who funds FISHING FOR MD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RUSSELL LIFE SKILLS AND READING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF MIAMI INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ci Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ci Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • United Way Miami Inc: 23% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ci Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ci Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $37k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ci’s filings →

More from the funding graph