Skip to content

· Private foundation

Christie Cadwell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$93kPhilanthropy$43kHealth$43kHousing & Shelter$20kHuman Services$10kPublic Benefit$7kCivil Rights$3kEducation$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,040
Median grant
6
States reached
$783k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPAN$10,000
COLORADO PUBLIC RADIO$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS$7,000
PADRINO SOCIETY$5,260
PALAPA SOCIETY$5,040
COBALT FUND$5,000
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSN$4,000
PROPUBLICA$2,500
POLITIFACT$1,257
WIKIMEDIA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EFAA: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
CO
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$254k · 14 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$254k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+28%

Still filing today

57%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PB
    PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +11%
  • BS
    BOULDER SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +104%
  • American Diabetes Association
    3× · 2023–2025 · $14k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • EF
    EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +28%
  • NT
    NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +6%
  • M
    MEDIAWISE
    one grant, 2024 · $435
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
2
Colorado Digital Health

Prime health advances health justice, equity, access quality and cost through innovation, collaboration, and community building.

Health
3
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
4
Colorado Nonprofit Association

Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.

Community Improvement
5
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
6
Colorado Press Association

Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…

—
7
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
8
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
9
Association of Clinical Research Professionals

Acrp promotes excellence in clinical research. we support clinical research professionals through training and development, the exchange of ideas and expertise, and certification. we serve as the preferred source for quality tools,…

Health
10
Colorado Bar Association

To advance the science of jurisprudence, secure the more efficient administration of justice, encourage the adoption of proper legislation, advocate thorough and continuing legal education, uphold the honor and integrity of the bar,…

—
11
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
12
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPAN: $50,000 · OtherSPANCOBALT FUND: $34,000 · OtherCOBALT FUNDPALAPA SOCIETY: $16,990 · OtherPALAPA SOCIETYLILTH FUND: $9,000 · OtherLILTH FUNDPOLITIFACT: $7,054 · OtherPOLITIFACTWIKIMEDIA: $7,000 · OtherWIKIMEDIAPADRINO SOCIETY: $5,260 · Other+2 more: $635 · OtherPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $50,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COL…PRO PUBLICA INC: $13,300 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA INCROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $17,000 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN PL…American Diabetes Association: $14,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes…ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDAT…NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,594 · HealthBOULDER SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesSouthern Center for Human Rights: $3,000 · Civil RightsBICYCLE COLORADO: $2,884 · Education
Other$129,939Arts & Culture$63,300Health$42,594Housing & Shelter$20,000Human Services$10,000Civil Rights$3,000Education$2,884

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOULDER SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $13,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Center for Human Rights: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBICYCLE COLORADO: $2,884 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,594 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Southern Center for Human Rights ↗
  • Who funds BICYCLE COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Christie Cadwell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Christie Cadwell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Christie Cadwell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph