Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chris and Michelle Peyerk Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$181kYouth Development$58kPhilanthropy$23kHealth$16kReligion$9kFood & Nutrition$8kEducation$7kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$716k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN$15,000
MACOMB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$15,000
A MOTHER'S WISH MICHIGAN$10,000
DUTTON FARMS$5,000
FRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS$5,000
THE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
MCLAREN GREATER LANSING FOUNDATION$2,500
TURNING POINT INC$2,000
CHILDREN MIRACLE NETWORK$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MACOMB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%MACOMB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $4k → 10%DUTTON FARMS: $5k → 8%DUTTON FARMS: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Chris and Michelle Peyerk Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 0%.

Chris and Michelle Peyerk Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$270k · 14 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$270k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+26%

Still filing today

50%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHealthFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM
    5× · 2019–2023 · $45k · revenue +172%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $37k · revenue +58%
  • TP
    TURNING POINT INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $28k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • GB
    GFGR - BLESSING IN A BACKPACK AVONDALE
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • PH
    PORT HURON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Federation for Children and Families

To develop and promote programs, funding, etc. for children and families.

—
2
Mid Michigan College Foundation

The mid michigan college foundation is a non-profit michigan corportion organized to receive and administer funds for charitable purposes in support of mid michigan college. the corporation is organized exclusively for the purpose of…

—
3
Michigan State Medical Society Foundation

To advance the field of health for the public good.

—
4
Council of Michigan Foundations

To lead, strengthen and support michigan's community of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
5
Michigan Health Endowment Fund

The mission of the michigan health endowment fund is to improve the health of michigan residents, with special emphasis on the health and wellness of children and seniors, while reducing the cost of health care.

Health
6
Michigan Credit Union Foundation

Cooperatively empowering credit unions to increase financial well-being by supporting community enrichment, financial education, and credit union development initiatives

Public Benefit
7
Michigan Civic Education Fund

To initiate, cultivate, and fund strategic nonpartisan efforts in michigan to promote economic and educational opportunity; enhance the quality of life and social welfare; defend and improve government accountability, ethics, and…

Civil Rights
8
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
9
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
10
Michigan Farm Bureau

Michigan farm bureau (mfb) is a member directed agricultural organization whose purpose is to represent, protect, and enhance the business, economic, social, and educational interests of our members located throughout the state of michigan.

—
11
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
12
The Macomb Foundation

To promote the advancement of business and community in macomb county, michigan.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mclaren Greater Lansing Foundation; the most unlike its peers is General Sports Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

A MOTHER'S WISH MICHIGAN: $40,000 · OtherA MOTHER'S WISH MICHIGANASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $30,000 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SOUTHEAST MICHIGANIndividual grant recipient: $20,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNORTH END SUPPORT TEAM: $11,500 · OtherNORTH END SUPPORT TEAMIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BROWARD COUNTY FL: $10,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BROWARD COUNTY FLKENSINGTON COMMUNITY CHURCH: $8,500 · OtherGFGR - BLESSING IN A BACKPACK AVONDALE: $7,500 · Other+10 more: $31,500 · Other+10 moreTURNING POINT INC: $28,000 · Human ServicesTURNING POINT INCTHE MACOMB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $19,000 · Human ServicesTHE MACOMB CHARIT…DUTTON FARM: $6,200 · Human ServicesDUTTON FARMFRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS: $37,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF FOSTE…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDA…GENERAL SPORTS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyGENERAL SPORTS F…THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE MIDNIGHT GO…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH OAKLAND COUNTY: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS …FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $6,000 · Food & NutritionROCHESTER COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationBlack Caucus Foundation of Michigan: $5,000 · Public BenefitMCLAREN GREATER LANSING FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthNational Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc: $2,000 · Health
Other$169,800Human Services$53,200Philanthropy$50,000Youth Development$48,000Food & Nutrition$6,000Education$5,000Public Benefit$5,000Health$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM: $45,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS: $37,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetTURNING POINT INC: $28,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MACOMB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDUTTON FARM: $6,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPORT HURON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetROCHESTER COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBlack Caucus Foundation of Michigan: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGENERAL SPORTS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH OAKLAND COUNTY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMCLAREN GREATER LANSING FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRochester Christian University: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MACOMB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds DUTTON FARM ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds PORT HURON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROCHESTER COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Black Caucus Foundation of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds GENERAL SPORTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH OAKLAND COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MCLAREN GREATER LANSING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Christian University ↗
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI21.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Strunk Foundation · Artichoke Garlic Foundation · The Barton Malow Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chris and Michelle Peyerk Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chris and Michelle Peyerk Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chris and Michelle Peyerk’s filings →

    More from the funding graph