Skip to content
Chorus Community Health Plans Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Chorus Community Health Plans Inc

Chorus community health plans, inc.

$54k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$296kHuman Services$61kPhilanthropy$20kEducation$20kFood & Nutrition$18kYouth Development$5k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $46,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $53,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$36,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$259M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S WI FOUNDATION$36,000
UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $13k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CTR: $10k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CTR: $10k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Chorus Community Health Plans Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in WI; by stated purpose, 88%.

Chorus Community Health Plans Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$325k · 6 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +111% since the first grant, against +89% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$325k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+111%
+89%

Still filing today

67%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $106k · revenue +7%
  • AW
    ASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $80k · revenue +313%
  • UC
    UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $61k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • Health Connections Incorporatedgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +89%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -37%
  • UO
    University of Wisconsin Madison
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Healthcare Careers of Southeast Wisconsin Inc

The mission of the center for healthcare careers of southeast wisconsin, inc. (chcsew) is to unite all appropriate stakeholders in a viable, flexible structure to locate, educate and support a workforce from service to professional levels…

Health
2
Froedtert & the Medical College of Wisconsin Community Physicians Inc

To advance the health of our communities through excellence and discovery, inspiring each person to live their unique, best life.

Health
3
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
4
Columbia St Mary's Hospital Milwaukee Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
5
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
6
Columbia Center Inc

To provide high quality birthing services, outpatient elective sterilization, and contraceptive services to families in the metro and northern milwaukee areas.effective july 1, 2018, columbia center, inc. ceased all operations and…

—
7
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
8
Columbia St Mary's Hospital Ozaukee Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

—
9
Community Memorial Hospital of Menomonee Falls Inc

To advance the health of our communities through excellence and discovery, inspiring each person to live their unique, best life.

Health
10
Ascension Wisconsin Pharmacy Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
11
Community Health Systems Inc

Our mission is to provide health and social services that will promote comfort, healing, and prevention of illnesses and injuries. our services are culturally competent and sensitive, community oriented, and provided regardless of income.

Health
12
Outreach Community Health Centers Inc

To ensure that men, women, and children in the greater milwaukee area receive the quality health care, behavioral health, housing, and supportive services they need in order to live at the highest possible level of self-sufficiency.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sixteenth Street Community Health Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $106,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SYSTEM INCHealth Connections Incorporated: $50,000 · HealthHealth Connections IncorporatedCOLUMBIA ST MARY'S INC: $20,000 · HealthCOLUMBIA ST MARY'S INC+1 more: $5,000 · HealthASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 · PhilanthropyASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATI…UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAU…FELLOWSHIP OPEN INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCITY OF MILWAUKEE: $40,000 · OtherCITY OF MILWAUKEEVILLAGE OF BROWN DEER: $17,856 · OtherVILLAGE OF BROWN DE…University of Wisconsin Madison: $9,500 · OtherUniversity of Wisco…SIXTEENTH STREET COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $5,000 · OtherSIXTEENTH STREET CO…UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $60,900 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY…
Health$181,000Philanthropy$105,000Other$72,356Human Services$60,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $106,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $60,900 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHealth Connections Incorporated: $50,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA ST MARY'S INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIXTEENTH STREET COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OPEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Fou…Joseph and Vera Zilbe…United Way of Greater…The Medical College o…Herbert H Kohl Charit…Baird Foundation IncFidelity Investments …
Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chorus Community Health Plans Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chorus Community Health Plans Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $17k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chorus Community Health Plans’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home