Loading…
· Public charity
CHORUS COMMUNITY HEALTH PLANS INC
To provide access to quality health care and services to its members in wi.
$54k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants
1
Communities
$36k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2023.
Health$181kPhilanthropy$105kHuman Services$61kOther$72k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
ucc's
2019
ucc's
2020
dentalmilwaukee
2021
milwaukeeenrollmentucc's
2022
milwaukeeucc's
2023
ucc's
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 2 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$36,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$259M
Total assets
Largest grants
- CHILDREN'S WI FOUNDATION$36,000
- UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$325k · 6 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
6
Total granted
$325k
$95k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+96%
+125%
Still filing today
67%
83%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CWCHILDREN'S WI FOUNDATION - FRC2× · 2022–2023 · $106k · revenue +96%
- MHMILWAUKEE HEALTH CARE PARTNERSHIP4× · 2017–2021 · $80k · revenue +39%
- UCUNITED COMMUNITY CTR6× · 2017–2023 · $61k · revenue +111%
Funded once
HEALTH CONNECTIONS INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +578%- UWUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +14%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Columbia St Mary's Hospital Milwaukee Inc
To improve the health and well-being of all people in the communities we serve.
Health
2
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc
To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.
—
3
Chorus Community Health Plans Inc
To provide access to quality health care and services to its members in wi.
Health
4
Center for Healthcare Careers of
To unite all appropriate stakeholders in a viable, flexible structure to locate, educate and support a workforce from service to professional levels in the healthcare industry in se wisconsin with a vision to create a supply of fully…
Health
5
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Inc
Pediatric health care services
Health
6
Milwaukee Health Services Inc
To provide medical and dental primary care services to a medically underserved population.
Health
7
Children's Medical Group Inc
Provide quality, accessible primary health care to children in the community.
Health
8
Wisconsin Hospital Association Inc
Advocating for its members to provide high quality health care services to wi communities.
—
9
Columbia St Mary's Hospital Ozaukee Inc
To improve the health and well-being of all people in the communities we serve.
—
10
Community Care Health Plan Inc
Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.we…
Health
11
Southwest Health Center Inc
Offer an integrated continuum of health care services. as the provider of choice of the people of southwest wisconsin, value is our driving force. continually improving our services enables us to surpass expectations while achieving…
Health
12
Mental Health Emergency Center Inc
The mental health emergency center (mhec) is a county-wide psychiatric emergency department offering 24/7/365 crisis mental health assessment, stabilization, treatment, and transition care management for children, adolescents and adults.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sixteenth Street Community Health and the most unlike its peers is United Way of Greater Milwaukee &. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$181,000Philanthropy$105,000Other$72,356Human Services$60,900
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S WI FOUNDATION - FRC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE HEALTH CARE PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CTR ↗
- Who funds HEALTH CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILW ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE HEALTH CARE PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds SIXTEENTH STREET COMMUNITY HEALTH CTR ↗
- Who funds WAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OPEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
United Way of Greater Milwaukee &WI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation CHORUS COMMUNITY HEALTH PLANS INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: HEALTH CONNECTIONS INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 6.8× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 825307989 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on HEALTH CONNECTIONS INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Chorus Community Health Plans Inc?
Find your warmest path to Chorus Community Health Plans Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines