Skip to content

· Private foundation

Choong & Hsia Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$156k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$926kScience & Tech$9kPublic Benefit$5kCivil Rights$4kCommunity Improvement$3kHealth$870
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $6k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION OF JINAN UNIVERSITY GUANGDONG$100,000
PEKING UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION$2,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$2,000
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,000
THE U C DAVIS FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 43% of grant dollars ($411k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 57% that went abroad ($537k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 55% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%80-20 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $5k → 8%PEKING UNIVERSITY ED FOUNDATION: $95k → 7%SOAR FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%NATOMAS CHARTER SCHOOL: $1k → 12%NAVY LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES GREATER AUSTIN COUNCIL: $5k → 10%80-20 EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%SUN YAT-SEN UNIVERSITY: $50k → 8%EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION OF JINAN UNIVERSITY GUANGDONG: $100k → 11%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 18%NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 7%80-20 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $5k → 8%PEKING UNIVERSITY ED FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%SOAR FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%JINAN-SACRAMENTO SISTER CITY CORPORATION: $3k → 12%80-20 EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION OF JINAN UNIVERSITY GUANGDONG: $95k → 11%OSU FOUNDATION: $1k → 18%NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%MIT ALUMNI FUND: $4k → 8%PEKING UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $75k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%THE U C DAVIS FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION OF JINAN UNIVERSITY GUANGDONG: $70k → 11%OSU FUND: $1k → 18%MIT ALUMNI FUND: $3k → 8%PEKING UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION OF JINAN UNIVERSITY GUANGDONG: $60k → 11%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 18%MIT ALUMNI FUND: $3k → 8%PEKING UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION OF JINAN UNIVERSITY GUANGDONG: $56k → 11%OSU FOUNDATION: $1k → 18%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $2k → 8%PEKING UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $45k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $1k → 10%EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION OF JINAN UNIVERSITY GUANGDONG: $55k → 11%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 18%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $2k → 8%PEKING UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%JINAN UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%OSU FOUNDATION: $1k → 18%MIT FUND: $2k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
CA
DE
DC
OK
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 57% of all-years giving ($537k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
China$536k · 8 grants
Singapore$1k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Choong & Hsia Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 39% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 36%.

Choong & Hsia Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 57% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$818k · 12 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$818k
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+10%

Still filing today

50%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Oregon State University Foundation
    6× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +42%
  • TS
    THE SOAR FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +147%
  • NT
    NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +622%

Funded once

  • SY
    SUN YAT-SEN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • JU
    JINAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • NL
    NAVY LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES GREATER AUSTIN COUNCIL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation of America (Sjtufa)
Education
2
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
American University

To advance knowledge, foster intellectual curiosity, build community, and empower lives of purpose, service, and leadership.

Education
7
Center for Advanced China Research
—
8
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
9
Us - China Policy Foundation
—
10
University of Hawaii Foundation

To unite donors' passions with the university of hawai'i's (uh) aspirations by raising philanthropic support and managing investments to benefit uh, the people of hawai'i and our future generations.

Education
11
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
12
Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science

Charles r. drew university of medicine and science is a private non-profit student-centered university that is committed to cultivating diverse health professional leaders who are dedicated to social justice and health equity for…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alzheimer's Disease Research Foundation; the most unlike its peers is 80-20 Educational Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION OF JINAN UNIVERSITY GUANGDONG: $436,000 · OtherEDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION OF JINAN UNIVERSITY GUANGDONGPEKING UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $245,000 · OtherPEKING UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATIONPEKING UNIVERSITY ED FOUNDATION: $105,000 · OtherPEKING UNIVERSITY ED FOUNDATIONSUN YAT-SEN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherSUN YAT-SEN UNIVERSITYJINAN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherJINAN UNIVERSITY+13 more: $24,580 · OtherMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $14,050 · EducationOregon State University Foundation: $6,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $4,500 · EducationTHE SOAR FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationNATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Education+2 more: $2,000 · Education80-20 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · Civil RightsAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 · HealthAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $100 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $100 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $20 · Health
Other$910,580Education$32,550Civil Rights$4,000Health$470

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $14,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budget80-20 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SOAR FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJINAN SACRAMENTO SISTER CITY: $2,500 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATOMAS CHARTER SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds 80-20 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JINAN SACRAMENTO SISTER CITY ↗
  • Who funds THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATOMAS CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Choong & Hsia Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Choong & Hsia Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Choong & Hsia’s filings →

More from the funding graph