Skip to content
Children's Well-Being League F/K/A Children's Welfare League at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Children's Well-Being League F/K/A Children's Welfare League

The children's well-being league (formerly known as the children's welfare league) has been in existence for over 100 years.

$305k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$39k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.4M
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $233,600, the rows itemized in this filing. The $305,020 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $71,420 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $224k
$26,280
Median grant
1
States reached
$458k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASHEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL$38,690
TC ROBERSON HIGH SCHOOL$35,040
AC REYNOLDS HIGH SCHOOL$32,850
CLYDE A ERWIN HIGH SCHOOL$28,470
ENKA HIGH SCHOOL$26,280
CHARLES D OWEN HIGH SCHOOL$20,440
NORTH BUNCOMBE HIGH SCHOOL$14,600
BUNCOMBE COMMUNITY SCHOOL EAST$14,600
BUNCOMBE EARLYMIDDLE COLLEGE$13,140
NESBITT DISCOVERY ACADEMY$9,490
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNC ASHEVILLE FOUNDATION: $18k → 12%UNIV OF NC ASHEVILLE: $17k → 12%CHARLES D OWEN HIGH SCHOOL: $20k → 12%CHARLES D OWEN HIGH SCHOOL: $17k → 12%CHARLES D OWEN HIGH SCHOOL: $17k → 12%CHARLES D OWEN HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 12%CHARLES D OWEN HIGH SCHOOL: $14k → 12%CHARLES D OWEN HIGH SCHOOL: $13k → 12%CHARLES D OWEN HIGH SCHOOL: $13k → 12%NORTH BUNCOMBE HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 12%NORTH BUNCOMBE HIGH SCHOOL: $13k → 12%ASHEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $39k → 12%TC ROBERSON HIGH SCHOOL: $35k → 12%AC REYNOLDS HIGH SCHOOL: $33k → 12%ASHEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $32k → 12%ASHEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $30k → 12%AC REYNOLDS HIGH SCHOOL: $27k → 12%TC ROBERSON HIGH SCHOOL: $26k → 12%AC REYNOLDS HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 12%TC ROBERSON HIGH SCHOOL: $23k → 12%ASHEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $22k → 12%ASHEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $21k → 12%ASHEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $20k → 12%CLYDE A ERWIN HIGH SCHOOL: $28k → 12%ASHEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $20k → 12%CLYDE A ERWIN HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 12%AC REYNOLDS HIGH SCHOOL: $19k → 12%CLYDE A ERWIN HIGH SCHOOL: $24k → 12%ASHEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $19k → 12%CLYDE A ERWIN HIGH SCHOOL: $18k → 12%ASHEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $19k → 12%CLYDE A ERWIN HIGH SCHOOL: $16k → 12%TC ROBERSON HIGH SCHOOL: $16k → 12%CLYDE A ERWIN HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 12%AC REYNOLDS HIGH SCHOOL: $16k → 12%CLYDE A ERWIN HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 12%TC ROBERSON HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 12%CLYDE A ERWIN HIGH SCHOOL: $14k → 12%BUNCOMBE COMMUNITY SCHOOL EAST: $15k → 12%AC REYNOLDS HIGH SCHOOL: $14k → 12%TC ROBERSON HIGH SCHOOL: $14k → 12%TC ROBERSON HIGH SCHOOL: $14k → 12%AC REYNOLDS HIGH SCHOOL: $14k → 12%AC REYNOLDS HIGH SCHOOL: $13k → 12%ENKA HIGH SCHOOL: $26k → 12%ENKA HIGH SCHOOL: $24k → 12%ENKA HIGH SCHOOL: $22k → 12%ENKA HIGH SCHOOL: $14k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 11 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$1.4M
$18k

Still filing today

0%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ASHEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $221k
  • AR
    AC REYNOLDS HIGH SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $173k
  • TR
    TC ROBERSON HIGH SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $169k

Funded once

  • TU
    The University of North Carolina at Asheville Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
0/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASHEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $220,814 · OtherASHEVILLE HIGH SCHOOLAC REYNOLDS HIGH SCHOOL: $173,067 · OtherAC REYNOLDS HIGH SCHOOLTC ROBERSON HIGH SCHOOL: $169,170 · OtherTC ROBERSON HIGH SCHOOLCLYDE A ERWIN HIGH SCHOOL: $168,392 · OtherCLYDE A ERWIN HIGH SCHOOLBuncombe County School: $140,181 · OtherBuncombe County SchoolCHARLES D OWEN HIGH SCHOOL: $135,176 · OtherCHARLES D OWEN HIGH SCHOOLNORTH BUNCOMBE HIGH SCHOOL: $97,781 · OtherNORTH BUNCOMBE HIGH SCHOOLBUNCOMBE COMMUNITY SCHOOL EAST: $96,895 · OtherBUNCOMBE COMMUNITY SCHOOL EASTBUNCOMBE EARLYMIDDLE COLLEGE: $93,469 · OtherBUNCOMBE EARLYMIDDLE COLLEGENESBITT DISCOVERY ACADEMY: $48,967 · Other+1 more: $35,000 · OtherThe University of North Carolina at Asheville Foundation Inc: $18,000 · Education
Other$1,378,912Education$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe University of North Carolina at Asheville Foundation Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The University of North Carolina at Asheville Foundation Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Children's Well-Being League F/K/A Children's Welfare League funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Children's Well-Being League F/K/A Children's Welfare League. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Children's Well-Being League F/K/A Children's Welfare League’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home