Skip to content
Children's Opportunity Group Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Children's Opportunity Group Inc

To support & contribute financially to worthwhile civic projects.

$201k
Granted FY2026still arriving
15
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2026 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $166,195, the rows itemized in this filing. The $201,171 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $34,976 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $133k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MULLINGS ACADEMY CHILDCARE CENTER$20,000
CHILDREN'S HARBOR$18,000
GOD'S LITTLE LAMBS$15,000
TOMORROW'S RAINBOW$15,000
ANN STORCK CENTER$13,000
THE BOUGAINVILLA HOUSE$11,145
CG SMITH COMM MENTAL HEALTH FNDN$10,950
BROWARD CHILDREN'S CENTER$10,000
4KIDS OF SOUTH FLORIDA$10,000
HANDY$10,000
PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS$8,600
DELIVER THE DREAM$6,500
SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES OF FLORIDA$6,000
THE LITTLE SCHOOLHOUSE$6,000
EVERY MOTHER'S ADVOCATE$6,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–26, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GOD'S LITTLE LAMBS: $15k → 13%GOD'S LITTLE LAMBS: $15k → 13%HANDY: $10k → 13%CHILDREN'S HARBOR: $18k → 13%CHILDREN'S HARBOR: $7k → 13%THE BOUGAINVILLA HOUSE: $11k → 13%HEART GALLERY OF BROWARD COUNTY: $10k → 13%BOUGAINVILLEA HOUSE: $7k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$234k · 11 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2026, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$234k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+190%

Still filing today

91%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’25’26
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MULLINGS ACADEMY CHILDCARE CENTER
    2× · 2025–2026 · $35k
  • GL
    GOD'S LITTLE LAMBS INC
    2× · 2025–2026 · $30k · revenue +67%
  • CH
    CHILDRENS HARBOR INC
    2× · 2025–2026 · $25k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • HG
    HEART GALLERY OF BROWARD COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue +190%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
2
Children's Diagnostic & Treatment Center Inc

To promote the optimal health and wellbeing of children and youth with special health care needs by providing family centered, comprehensive prevention, intervention and treatment services within a medical home environment. our vision is…

Health
3
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
4
Rapid Resource for Families Inc
Human Services
5
Children's Advocacy Center of Southwest Florida Inc

Since 1981, children's advocacy center of southwest florida, inc. (cac) has advocated for a healthy, safe community for children through a multidisciplinary team approach to child abuse and neglect. our mission is to create a safe and…

Human Services
6
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
7
Isaiah's Place 1

The organization aims to connect, nurture, and restore children and families in the communities they serve. the organization accomplishes this mission through their foster care and adoption program as well as their child advocacy center.…

Human Services
8
Sonshine Children Center Inc

Serving families with foster and adoptive children.

Human Services
9
Bridging Lives Inc Bridging Lives Inc

The organization provides residential group care for children that are adjudicated dependent to the state of florida foster care system.

Human Services
10
Central Florida Childrens Home

To provide homes for disadvantaged children.

Human Services
11
Springs Holistic Center Inc

Provide therapeutic services to children

Human Services
12
My Fathers House Inc

My Fathers House, Inc. provides assessment, evaluation, intensive outpatient treatment, outpatient treatment, individual counseling, family counseling and aftercare group services. MFHs operation are located in Gloucester City, New Jersey.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Harbor Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Bougainvilla House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
4/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOD'S LITTLE LAMBS INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesGOD'S LITTLE LAMBS INCCHILDRENS HARBOR INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS HARBOR INCThe Bougainvilla House Inc: $18,145 · Human ServicesThe Bougainvilla House IncHEART GALLERY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHEART GALLERY OF BROWARD COUNTY INCHELPING ADVANCE AND NURTURE THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOUTH INC (HANDY INC): $10,000 · Human ServicesHELPING ADVANCE AND NURTURE THE DEVELO…MULLINGS ACADEMY CHILDCARE CENTER: $35,000 · OtherMULLINGS ACADEMY CHILDCARE CENTERANN STORCK CENTER INC: $23,000 · OtherANN STORCK CENTER INCSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC: $13,000 · OtherSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINCTHE LITTLE SCHOOLHOUSE INC: $12,000 · OtherTHE LITTLE SCHOOLHOUSE INC4KIDS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $10,000 · Other4KIDS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INCTOMORROW'S RAINBOW INC: $25,000 · HealthTOMORROW'S RAINBOW INCBROWARD CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $20,000 · HealthBROWARD CHILDRENS CENTER INCCHRISTINA G SMITH COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $16,950 · HealthCHRISTINA G SMITH COMMUNITY …DELIVER THE DREAM INC: $6,500 · HealthDELIVER THE DREAM INCPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $15,600 · Youth DevelopmentEVERY MOTHER'S ADVOCATE INC: $6,000 · Religion
Human Services$93,145Other$93,000Health$68,450Youth Development$15,600Religion$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDRENS HARBOR INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTOMORROW'S RAINBOW INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetANN STORCK CENTER INC: $23,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Bougainvilla House Inc: $18,145 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCHRISTINA G SMITH COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $16,950 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $15,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LITTLE SCHOOLHOUSE INC: $12,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The Batchelor Foundat…The Jim Moran Foundat…Early Learning Coalit…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Broward IncFL19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Broward Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · Early Learning Coalition of Broward County Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Children's Opportunity Group Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Children's Opportunity Group Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
  • Broward Childrens Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Ann Storck Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Children's Opportunity Group’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home