Skip to content

· Public charity

Children's Hope Alliance Foundation

To provide a safe, healing journey for hurting children and families - creating hope now and in the future.

$4.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3.9M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$33MEducation$1.5MHousing & Shelter$116k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $202k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.9M
$3,891,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$81M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BARIUM SPRINGS HOME FOR CHILDREN$3,891,500
CHILDREN'S HOPE ALLIANCE$202,474
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$35M · 6 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
0

Total granted

$35M
$0

Still filing today

83%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BARIUM SPRINGS HOME FOR CHILDREN
    7× · 2017–2024 · $20M · revenue +47% · 26% of their budget
  • PF
    PROPERTIES FOR CHILDREN
    5× · 2017–2021 · $6.3M · revenue +14% · 43% of their budget
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOPE ALLIANCE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3.6M · revenue +22%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    03Its field
    03the grantee network

    6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    4
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    5/6
    Grantees still filing
    5/6
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    BARIUM SPRINGS HOME FOR CHILDREN: $20,438,729 · Human ServicesBARIUM SPRINGS HOME FOR CHILDRENPROPERTIES FOR CHILDREN: $6,281,351 · Human ServicesPROPERTIES FOR CHILDRENCHILDREN'S HOPE ALLIANCE: $3,643,011 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOPE ALLIANCEGRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $2,808,330 · Human ServicesGRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN INCGRANDFATHER ACADEMY INC: $1,498,158 · OtherHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF NORTHWEST NORTH CAROLINA: $116,285 · Housing & Shelter
    Human Services$33,171,421Other$1,498,158Housing & Shelter$116,285

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBARIUM SPRINGS HOME FOR CHILDREN: $20,438,729 over 7y, 26% of budgetPROPERTIES FOR CHILDREN: $6,281,351 over 5y, 43% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOPE ALLIANCE: $3,643,011 over 7y, 22% of budgetGRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $2,808,330 over 3y, 27% of budgetGRANDFATHER ACADEMY INC: $1,498,158 over 4y, 89% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF NORTHWEST NORTH CAROLINA: $116,285 over 5y, 2.2% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds BARIUM SPRINGS HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
    • Who funds PROPERTIES FOR CHILDREN ↗
    • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOPE ALLIANCE ↗
    • Who funds GRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
    • Who funds GRANDFATHER ACADEMY INC ↗
    • Who funds HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF NORTHWEST NORTH CAROLINA ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Children's Hope Alliance Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Children's Hope Alliance Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24
    no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–24
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Children's Hope Alliance’s filings →

      More from the funding graph