· Public charity
Children's Hope Alliance Foundation
To provide a safe, healing journey for hurting children and families - creating hope now and in the future.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k1 grant · $202k
- $250k+1 grant · $3.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BARIUM SPRINGS HOME FOR CHILDREN | $3,891,500 |
| CHILDREN'S HOPE ALLIANCE | $202,474 |
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- BSBARIUM SPRINGS HOME FOR CHILDREN7× · 2017–2024 · $20M · revenue +47% · 26% of their budget
- PFPROPERTIES FOR CHILDREN5× · 2017–2021 · $6.3M · revenue +14% · 43% of their budget
- CHCHILDREN'S HOPE ALLIANCE7× · 2017–2024 · $3.6M · revenue +22%
Funded once
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Children's Hope Alliance Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Children's Hope Alliance Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Children's Hope Alliance’s filings →