Skip to content
Children's Health Care Associates Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Children's Health Care Associates Inc

To provide medical and speciality care for patients and educational, research and administrative services to the children's hospital of philadelphia and the university of pennsylvania school of medicine.

$73M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$73M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$283MEducation$101kPhilanthropy$83kArts & Culture$20k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $63k
  • $250k+1 grant · $73M
$42,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$263M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHOP FOUNDATION$72,815,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$42,500
MUSIC FOR MEDICINE$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NORTH AMERICAN SOCFOR PEDIATRI GASTROENTEROLOGY: $20k → 7%AERODIGESTIVE SINGLE TOPIC SYMPOSIUM: $20k → 7%THE NASPGHAN FOUNDATION: $8k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
NJ
VA
MD
NC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$283M · 9 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$283M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-24%
+21%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $282M · revenue +180%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    7× · 2018–2025 · $155k · revenue +26%
  • NA
    NORTH AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PEDIATRIC GAS TROENTEROLOGY HEPATOLOGY & NUTRITION INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $48k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • AS
    American Society of Echocardiography Incorporatedgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +27%
  • AA
    AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +14%
  • TP
    THE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…

Science & Tech
4
American College of Chest Physicians

To champion the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chest diseases through education, communication, and research.

—
5
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
6
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
7
American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

To advance and disseminate the science and practice of hepatology, and to promote liver health and quality patient care.

Health
8
The Cardiovascular Medical Research and Education Fund Inc
—
9
American College of Physicians Inc

The mission of the american college of physicians (acp), www. acponline.org, is to enhance the quality and effectiveness of health care by fostering excellence and professionalism in the practice of medicine. acp was founded in 1915 to…

Health
10
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
11
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
12
Conquering Congenital Heart Disease

At conquering chd we exist to conquerin the most common birth defect. we engage, listen, learn, and act. we create visibility and empower all impacted by chd. we accomplish this through awareness, knowledge, community and research.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $282,268,116 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION+8 more: $340,200 · HealthTHE AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FOUNDATION INC: $115,000 · OtherAmerican Society of Echocardiography Incorporated: $10,500 · OtherCystic Fibrosis FoundationDelaware Valley Chptr: $10,000 · OtherADAGP CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $82,500 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION: $7,200 · PhilanthropyNORTH AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PEDIATRIC GAS TROENTEROLOGY HEPATOLOGY & NUTRITION INC: $47,500 · Human ServicesTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $6,000 · Education
Health$282,608,316Other$135,500Philanthropy$89,700Human Services$47,500Education$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $282,268,116 over 9y, 17% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $154,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FOUNDATION INC: $115,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $85,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetADAGP CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $82,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PEDIATRIC GAS TROENTEROLOGY HEPATOLOGY & NUTRITION INC: $47,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Liver Foundation: $31,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIRTUA HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Society of Echocardiography Incorporated: $10,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION: $7,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMADLYN AND LEONARD ABRAMSON CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE AND SUBSIDIARIES: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Donor Advised Charita…
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Children's Health Care Associates Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Children's Health Care Associates Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Children's Health Care Associates’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home