Skip to content

· Public charity

Children Incorporated

To arrange and provide funding for supplies and services to meet the basic and educational needs of impoverished children.

$2.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
108
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$8.3MHuman Services$134k
02FY2025 · 108 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 108 grants below total $1,224,426, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,823,063 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,598,637 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k61 grants · $442k
  • $10k–50k46 grants · $732k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$9,400
Median grant
8
States reached
$9.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOTTS CREEK COMMUNITY CENTER$50,295
SHONTO PREPARATORY SCHOOL$32,688
ALLEGHANY HIGH SCHOOL$31,073
MARTIN COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL$27,356
KNOTT COUNTY CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL$25,730
SPARTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$25,258
DZILTH COMMUNITY GRANT SCHOOL$22,902
JOHNS CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$22,184
MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL$22,138
PHELPS HIGH SCHOOL$20,973
MAGOFFIN CO HIGH SCHOOL$20,946
BREATHITT CO JR-SR HIGH SCHOOL$19,056
BEVINS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$18,744
MORGAN COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL$18,408
CANNONSBURG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$17,651
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 25%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%DZILTH COMMUNITY GRANT SCHOOL: $61k → 22%LOTTS CREEK COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 27%MARTIN COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $32k → 36%DZILTH COMMUNITY GRANT SCHOOL: $35k → 22%LOTTS CREEK COMMUNITY: $45k → 27%MARTIN COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $31k → 36%DZILTH COMMUNITY GRANT SCHOOL: $32k → 22%LOTTS CREEK COMMUNITY CENTER: $32k → 27%MARTIN COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $30k → 36%ST MICHAELS SPECIAL ED SCHOOL: $41k → 28%DZILTH COMMUNITY GRANT SCHOOL: $24k → 22%LAKE VALLEY BOARDING SCHOOL: $23k → 32%LOTTS CREEK COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 27%MARTIN COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $30k → 36%SHONTO SCHOOL: $37k → 26%DZILTH COMMUNITY GRANT SCHOOL: $24k → 22%PHELPS HIGH SCHOOL: $24k → 25%BREATHITT CO JR-SR HIGH SCHOOL: $23k → 30%MARTIN COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $27k → 36%SHONTO PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $33k → 26%DZILTH COMMUNITY GRANT SCHOOL: $23k → 22%PHELPS HIGH SCHOOL: $24k → 25%BREATHITT CO JR-SR HIGH SCHOOL: $23k → 30%EDEN ELEMENTARY: $27k → 36%SHONTO PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $29k → 26%EDEN ELEMENTARY: $23k → 36%SHONTO SCHOOL: $29k → 26%SHONTO SCHOOL: $29k → 26%SHONTO SCHOOL: $28k → 26%MARTIN COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL: $23k → 36%SHONTO SCHOOL: $27k → 26%SHONTO PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $26k → 26%SPARTA ELEMENTARY: $38k → 16%SPARTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $35k → 16%SPARTA ELEMENTARY: $32k → 16%ALLEGHANY HIGH SCHOOL: $31k → 16%SPARTA ELEMENTARY: $30k → 16%SPARTA ELEMENTARY: $29k → 16%ALLEGHANY HIGH SCHOOL: $27k → 16%ALLEGHANY HIGH SCHOOL: $27k → 16%SPARTA ELEMENTARY: $26k → 16%ALLEGHANY HIGH SCHOOL: $26k → 16%KNOTT COUNTY CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $26k → 29%SPARTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $25k → 16%KNOTT COUNTY CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 29%SPARTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $25k → 16%KNOTT COUNTY CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $24k → 29%ALLEGHANY HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
KY
WV
VA
AZ
NM
NC
DC
LA

Grants abroad, by region: $1.5M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 20 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Bolivia$260k · 18% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CHILD SPONSORSHIP

Kenya$171k · 12% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CHILD SPONSORSHIP

Guatemala$163k · 11% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CHILD SPONSORSHIP

Philippines$138k · 9% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CHILD SPONSORSHIP

India$137k · 9% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CHILD SPONSORSHIP

El Salvador$72k · 5% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CHILD SPONSORSHIP

Brazil$63k · 4% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CHILD SPONSORSHIP

Lebanon$56k · 4% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CHILD SPONSORSHIP

Liberia$56k · 4% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CHILD SPONSORSHIP

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.0M · 48 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

48 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
4

Total granted

$8.0M
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+14%

Still filing today

15%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SG
    SHONTO GOVERNING BOARD OF EDUCATION DBA SHONTO PREPARATORY ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $260k · revenue +7%
  • HC
    HANAA'DLI COMMUNITY SCHOOL DORMITORY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $111k · revenue +12%
  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF RICHMOND INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $60k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • IB
    IGLESIA BAUTISTA DE METROPOLIS
    one grant, 2021 · $21k
  • FS
    FIRSTLINE SCHOOLS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue +14%
  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF DETROIT
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue -97%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gulf Stream School Inc

Education of grades pre-school through eighth grade.

Education
2
Communities in Schools Indiana

Surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Youth Development
3
Standing Rock Community Grant School

To provide elementary and secondary education to the children of the stabding rcok indian reservation.

—
4
Communities in Schools of Cleveland County Inc

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Education
5
Communities in Schools of North Central Washington

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Human Services
6
North Shore Community School

North shore community school's mission is to excel in connecting our students' academics and learning with their natural and social environments in a nurturing community setting.

Education
7
Louisville Collegiate School

Louisville collegiate school inspires academic excellence, extraordinary character and global citizenship.

Education
8
Desert Star Community School

To provide an education that considers the needs of the whole child, develops the full diversity of human intelligence within each individual, and instills a life-long love of learning.

Education
9
Puget Sound Community School

Founded in 1994, PSCS is a small, independent middle and high school located in the Chinatown/International District of downtown Seattle. PSCS is committed to co-creating a brave space for community-centered education, critical curriculum,…

—
10
Communities in Schools of Miami Inc

The mission of communities in schools is to surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

—
11
Gestalt Community Schools

Gestalt community schools is a charter management organization that serves k-12 scholars. gestalt community schools leverages community assets to empower citizens who will be college-ready, career-ready, and community-ready.

Education
12
Southshire Community School

Educate children in grades k - 8.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities in Schools Gulf South Inc; the most unlike its peers is Communities in Schools of Detroit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PIKE COUNTY SCHOOLS: $886,888 · OtherPIKE COUNTY SCHOOLSMARTIN COUNTY SCHOOLS: $644,846 · OtherMARTIN COUNTY SCHOOLSKNOTT CO BOARD OF EDUCATION: $643,958 · OtherKNOTT CO BOARD OF EDUCATIONLAKE VALLEY BOARDING SCHOOL: $550,617 · OtherLAKE VALLEY BOARDING SCHOOLMAGOFFIN CO HIGH SCHOOL: $486,667 · OtherMAGOFFIN CO HIGH SCHOOLAlleghany County Schools: $473,733 · OtherAlleghany County SchoolsNATIONAL PARK SERVICE: $442,179 · OtherNATIONAL PARK SERVICEMORGAN COUNTY SCHOOLS: $366,928 · OtherBreathitt County Board of Education: $334,064 · OtherBATH COUNTY SCHOOLS: $302,087 · Other+40 more: $2,298,012 · Other+40 moreSHONTO GOVERNING BOARD OF EDUCATION DBA SHONTO PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $260,493 · EducationLOTTS CREEK COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $174,546 · EducationHANAA'DLI COMMUNITY SCHOOL DORMITORY INC: $111,117 · EducationPINON COMMUNITY SCHOOL BOARD INC: $31,220 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE NATION'S CAPITAL INC: $21,169 · Education+1 more: $14,401 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS GULF SOUTH INC: $298,034 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF RICHMOND INC: $59,936 · Crime & Legal
Other$7,429,979Education$612,946Youth Development$298,034Crime & Legal$59,936

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS GULF SOUTH INC: $298,034 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetSHONTO GOVERNING BOARD OF EDUCATION DBA SHONTO PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $260,493 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetLOTTS CREEK COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $174,546 over 5y, 21% of budgetHANAA'DLI COMMUNITY SCHOOL DORMITORY INC: $111,117 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetST MICHAELS ASSOCIATION FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION INC: $105,281 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF RICHMOND INC: $59,936 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPINON COMMUNITY SCHOOL BOARD INC: $31,220 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTUBA CITY HIGH SCHOOL BOARD INC DBA GREYHILLS ACADEMY HIGH SCHOOL: $28,297 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE NATION'S CAPITAL INC: $21,169 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFIRSTLINE SCHOOLS INC: $14,401 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF DETROIT: $6,395 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS GULF SOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds SHONTO GOVERNING BOARD OF EDUCATION DBA SHONTO PREPARATORY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds LOTTS CREEK COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HANAA'DLI COMMUNITY SCHOOL DORMITORY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MICHAELS ASSOCIATION FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF RICHMOND INC ↗
  • Who funds PINON COMMUNITY SCHOOL BOARD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jobs for Kentucky's Graduates IncKY28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jobs for Kentucky's Graduates Inc · Berea College · Save The Children Federation Inc · Share Our Strength · The Arh Foundation for Healthier Communities Inc · The Mr Holland's Opus Foundation · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Save the Music Foundation · Reading Is Fundamental Inc · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc · Good Sports Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Children Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Children Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Children Incorporated?

    Find your warmest path to Children Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Children’s filings →

    More from the funding graph