Skip to content
Chicago Dental Society at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Chicago Dental Society

The health of the public, to promote the art and science of dentistry and to represent the interest of the members of the profession and the public which it serves.

$84k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02Its granteesRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$8.5MEducation$42kHuman Services$35kArts & Culture$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $79,235, the rows itemized in this filing. The $84,140 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,905 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
$10,835
Median grant
—
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHSIDE CDS BRANCH$14,115
NORTH SUBURBAN CDS BRANCH$12,802
NORTHWEST SUBURBAN CDS BRANCH$11,620
WEST SUBURBAN CDS BRANCH$10,835
WEST SIDE CDS BRANCH$10,545
NORTHWEST SIDE CDS BRANCH$8,418
SOUTH SUBURBAN CDS BRANCH$5,750
KENWOOD HYDE PARK CDS BRANCH$5,150
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.4M · 6 repeat orgs$207k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$8.4M
$207k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
PhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CHICAGO DENTAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $7.5M · revenue +71% · 89% of their budget
  • CD
    CHICAGO DENTAL SOCIETY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $444k · revenue +1%
  • IS
    Illinois State Dental Society
    5× · 2017–2023 · $373k · revenue -7%

Funded once

  • CD
    CHICAGO DENTAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $167k
  • IM
    ISDS - MISSION OF MERCY
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • D
    DENT-IL-PAC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO DENTAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $7,550,000 · PhilanthropyCHICAGO DENTAL SOCIETY FOUNDATIONIllinois State Dental Society: $372,956 · OtherCHICAGO DENTAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $167,075 · OtherOTHERS UNDER 5000: $33,576 · OtherKENWOOD HYDE PARK CDS BRANCH: $28,174 · OtherISDS - MISSION OF MERCY: $25,000 · Other+2 more: $27,029 · OtherCHICAGO DENTAL SOCIETY: $443,545 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$7,550,000Other$653,810Community Improvement$443,545

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHICAGO DENTAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $7,550,000 over 4y, 89% of budgetCHICAGO DENTAL SOCIETY: $443,545 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetIllinois State Dental Society: $372,956 over 5y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHICAGO DENTAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO DENTAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Illinois State Dental Society ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chicago Dental Society funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chicago Dental Society. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chicago Dental Society’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home