· Public charity
Chicago Commons Association
Chicago Commons' mission is to empower individuals, families, and communities to overcome poverty, embrace opportunities, and thrive across generations.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Gads Hill Center | $7,917,541 |
| Onward Neighborhood House | $2,504,163 |
| Eyes on the Future | $1,756,449 |
| Learn Together Grow Together | $1,327,456 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $30.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- GHGADS HILL CENTER4× · 2022–2025 · $30M · revenue +11% · 48% of their budget
- ONONWARD NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE4× · 2022–2025 · $10.0M · revenue +97% · 46% of their budget
- EOEyes on the Future4× · 2022–2025 · $6.0M
Funded once
- LTLearn Together Grow Together IIone grant, 2022 · $321k
- LTLearn Together Grow Together IIIone grant, 2022 · $292k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Chicago Commons Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chicago Commons Association. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Chicago Commons Association’s filings →