· Public charity
Chesapeake Employers' Insurance Company
CHESAPEAKE EMPLOYERS' INSURANCE COMPANY was established by statute to be the workers' compensation insurer of last resort as well as a competitive insurer in the state of maryland.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $76,454 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $126,326 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $49,872 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $69k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND | $35,072 |
| AMERICAS CHARITIES | $13,582 |
| BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $10,000 |
| ASSOCIATED BLACK CHARITIES | $10,000 |
| FRANCISCAN CENTER INC | $7,800 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +134% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE4× · 2017–2020 · $48k · revenue +134%
- TMTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC3× · 2017–2021 · $21k · revenue +57%
- FCFRANCISCAN CENTER INC3× · 2018–2022 · $21k · revenue +172%
Funded once
- TSTHE SEXUAL ASSAULTSPOUSE ABUSE RESOURCE CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +52%
- PGPRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -8%
- KCKIDS CHANCE OF MARYLAND INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue +42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.
To provide dignified access to free groceries for qualified families in Arlington, VA and surrounding counties.
The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.
Catholic charities of the archdiocese of washington is the area's leading provider of comprehensive human services, offered to individuals and families in need, through 47 programs in 29 locations in the district of columbia, montgomery,…
The community action council of howard county (cac) seeks to diminish poverty and enable self-sufficiency for all howard county individuals, families, and children in need through housing assistance, food assistance, energy assistance,…
To develop and implement strategies to improve the safety of patient care in maryland. mpsc unites stakeholders to champion patient safety, eliminate preventable harm, and accelerate improvements in safety quality across healthcare.
Cultivating inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.
To be the leading solution-focused resource in building strong, sustainable families and communities through family support services, innovative training, community capacity building, economic development and social enterprise.
Community based nonprofit organization
See schedule o medstar franklin square medical center, a member of medstar health, provides the highest quality healthcare and education to our communities.
The council was organized for the purpose of providing its members with adequate representation in various union related matters.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is America's Charities and the most unlike its peers is Baltimore Urban Leadership Foundation aka the Door. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THE SEXUAL ASSAULTSPOUSE ABUSE RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds PRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds FRANCISCAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICA'S CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds KIDS CHANCE OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED BLACK CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds Baltimore Urban Leadership Foundation aka The Door ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chesapeake Employers' Insurance Company funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc — 11% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Franciscan Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Sexual Assaultspouse Abuse Resource Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.