Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chelgren-Haviland Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$200
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Human Services$2kHealth$2kFood & Nutrition$1kHousing & Shelter$1kEnvironment$650Animals$650International$200Other$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
4
States reached
$43k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$200
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$200
MACULAR DEGENERATION RESEARCH$200
SALVATION ARMY$200
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$200
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS$200
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$200
COVENANT HOUSE$100
USO$100
THE HUMANE SOCIETY$100
COVENANT HOUSE$100
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$100
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$100
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$100
ASPCA$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9k · 11 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$9k
$700

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+123%

Still filing today

36%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $800 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHealthInternationalAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DA
    DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF MINNESOTA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +124%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1k · revenue +25%
  • MC
    Morton Cure Paralysis Fund
    3× · 2022–2024 · $500 · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • MM
    METRO MEALS ON WHEELS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +123%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2022 · $200 · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Meals On Wheels America

To empower local community programs to improve the health and quality of life of the seniors they serve so that no one is left hungry or isolated.

Food & Nutrition
3
American Diabetes Association

The mission of the American Diabetes Association is to prevent and cure diabetes and to improve the lives of all people affected by diabetes.

Health
4
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
5
The Global Hunger Project

The hunger project is working to create a world without hunger through women-centered, holistic development strategies that address the root causes of hunger and poverty. in 2025, it reached nearly 12.7 million people in over 10,000…

International
6
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
9
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
10
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
11
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
12
Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc

Muscular dystrophy association (mda) is the #1 voluntary health organization in the united states for people living with muscular dystrophy, als, and related neuromuscular diseases. (cont. schedule o) for over 70 years, mda has led the way…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United States Fund for Unicef; the most unlike its peers is Morton Cure Paralysis Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $1,500 · OtherST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITALDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF MINNESOTA INC: $1,500 · OtherDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF MINNESOTA INCCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,300 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSESALVATION ARMY: $1,300 · OtherSALVATION ARMYTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $750 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYTHE HUMANE SOCIETY: $550 · OtherTHE HUMANE SOCIETYMACULAR DEGENERATION RESEARCH: $400 · OtherUSO: $300 · Other+3 more: $400 · OtherSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $1,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST …METRO MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $500 · Food & NutritionMETRO MEALS ON …Morton Cure Paralysis Fund: $500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 · HealthTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $300 · AnimalsUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $200 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $100 · InternationalWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $200 · Human Services
Other$8,000Food & Nutrition$1,500Health$600Animals$300International$300Human Services$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF MINNESOTA INC: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMorton Cure Paralysis Fund: $500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMETRO MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT OF MINNESOTA INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds Morton Cure Paralysis Fund ↗
  • Who funds METRO MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chelgren-Haviland Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chelgren-Haviland Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chelgren-Haviland’s filings →

    More from the funding graph