Skip to content
Chase Home Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Chase Home Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$184kReligion$20kArts & Culture$1k
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$938
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGENCY CLUB TOWNHOMES$4,957
ANNAPOLIS GARDENS$4,121
OBERY COURT- COLLEGE CREEK$3,603
CLAIBORNE PLACE$3,345
Individual grant recipient$1,900
OBERY COURT COLLEGE CREEK PHASE II$1,757
Individual grant recipient$1,700
Individual grant recipient$1,688
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ANNAPOLIS$1,582
Individual grant recipient$1,550
Individual grant recipient$1,411
HENDERSON-WEBB INC$1,323
SOUTHGATE APARTMENTS & TOWNHOMES$1,290
ADMIRAL OAKS LLC$1,130
DOWNTOWN ANNAPOLIS TA BOWMAN PLACE$1,038
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 4%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 4%TALL OAKS: $2k → 6%KAY MANAGEMENT CO INC: $2k → 8%EXTENDED STAY AMERICA: $1k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $1k → 11%MOUNTAIN RIDGE LLLP: $1k → 11%MARTA & MATTA REAL ESTATE: $1k → 6%AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES INC AVALON RUSSETT: $1k → 6%GELFUND 2 GATEWATER LANDING APTS LP: $3k → 6%MARLEY MEADOWS APARTMENTS: $1k → 6%HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ANNAPOLIS: $28k → 6%HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ANNAPOLIS: $21k → 6%SPA COVE APTS: $4k → 6%HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ANNAPOLIS: $3k → 6%NAUTILUS POINT: $3k → 6%QUIET WATERS LANDING: $3k → 6%ANNAPOLIS ROADS APARTMENTS: $2k → 6%BAY SHORE LANDING: $2k → 6%BAY RIDGE GARDENS: $2k → 6%INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES: $2k → 6%QUIET WATERS LLC: $2k → 6%HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ANNAPOLIS: $2k → 6%MORRIS BLUM: $1k → 6%BAY RIDGE GARDENS: $1k → 6%QUIET WATERS LANDING: $1k → 6%ANNAPOLIS ROADS APARTMENTS: $1k → 6%SOUTHERN MANAGEMENT COMPANIES: $2k → 6%ST ANNE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $10k → 6%ST ANNE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $10k → 6%OBERY COURT: $6k → 6%ST ANNES PARISH: $5k → 6%THE LIGHT HOUSE: $5k → 6%ANNAPOLIS GARDENS: $4k → 6%OBERY COURT- COLLEGE CREEK: $4k → 6%CLAIBORNE PLACE: $3k → 6%ANNAPOLIS GARDENS: $2k → 6%ANNAPOLIS GARDENS: $2k → 6%BYWATER MUTUAL HOMES: $2k → 6%OBERY COURT COLLEGE CREEK PHASE II: $2k → 6%HENDERSON-WEBB INC: $1k → 6%ADMIRAL OAKS LLC: $1k → 6%DOWNTOWN ANNAPOLIS TA BOWMAN PLACE: $1k → 6%ADMIRAL OAKS APARTMENTS: $1k → 6%REGENCY CLUB TOWNHOMES: $5k → 6%SOUTHGATE APARTMENTS & TOWNHOMES: $3k → 6%GLEN RIDGE APT ASSC LLC: $2k → 6%SOUTHGATE APARTMENTS & TOWNHOMES: $1k → 6%HOUSING COMMISSION OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY: $1k → 6%WAYSON WOODS: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$106k · 12 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
39

Total granted

$106k
$62k

Still filing today

0%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ANNAPOLIS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $54k
  • SA
    ST ANNES EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k
  • AG
    ANNAPOLIS GARDENS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $8k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • SA
    ST ANNES PARISH
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • TL
    THE LIGHT HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ANNAPOLIS: $53,712 · OtherHOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ANNAPOLISST ANNES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherST ANNES EPISCOPAL CHURCHANNAPOLIS GARDENS: $8,124 · Other+76 more: $116,816 · Other+76 moreTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterARUNDEL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$198,652Housing & Shelter$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBYWATER MUTUAL HOMES INC: $1,924 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARUNDEL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds BYWATER MUTUAL HOMES INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chase Home Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chase Home Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Arundel Community Development Services Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chase Home’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home