How much did CHASE ALICE P TR UIND grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of CHASE ALICE P TR UIND’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

girls

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

—

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$50,000

Median grant

States reached

$6.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

MASS INSIGHT EDUCATION AND RESEARCH$75,000
THE POSSIBLE ZONE$50,000
SOCIEDAD LATINA$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 8%. 97% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.4M · 9 repeat orgs$581k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +191% since the first grant, against +66% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.4M

$531k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+191%

+66%

Still filing today

89%

60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Youth DevelopmentEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHealthEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MI
MASS INSIGHT EDUCATION AND RESEARCH
4× · 2022–2025 · $265k · revenue +31%
TECH GOES HOME
2× · 2020–2021 · $200k · revenue +409%
TS
THRIVE SCHOLARS
3× · 2022–2024 · $140k · revenue +191%

Funded once

BB
BUILD BOSTON
one grant, 2020 · $100k
JF
JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY LIBRARY
one grant, 2019 · $75k · revenue -37%
HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INCgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +251%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Massachusetts Education & Career

Massedco works to bridge the gap in postsecondary education attainment for low-income, first generation youth and adults in massachusetts.

Education

Massachusetts Business Roundtable Inc

Mbr engages with public and private leaders to develop public policy solutions that enhance massachusetts' long-term competitive position and make it a highly-desirable place to do business within a global economy.

—

Breakthrough Greater Boston Inc

To inspire excitement for learning, create paths to and through college, and promote careers in education.

Education

Junior Achievement of Greater Boston

The mission of junior achievement (ja) is to inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy. using hands-on experiences, ja helps to prepare young people for the real world by teaching skills in financial literacy,…

International

Massachusetts Housing Investment

Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…

Housing & Shelter

Massachusetts Business Alliance

Promote & support continuous improvement & innovation in schools to ensure every student receives a high quality education.

Education

Junior Achievement of Southern Ma

Junior achievement of southern massachusetts inspires and prepares young people to succeed in the global economy. our volunteer-delivered, experiential programs give students knowledge and skills in financial literacy, work readiness and…

International

League of Women Voters of Massachusetts

The league of women voters of massachusetts (lwvma), a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public…

Civil Rights

Boston Bar Association

To advance the highest standards of excellence for the legal profession, to facilitate access to justice, and to serve the community at large.

—

Growth Through Learning Inc

Supporting education and development for young women in kenya, tanzania and uganda

Education

Boston After School & Beyond Inc

Boston after school & beyond, inc. is a public private partnership that pursues a unified after-school and summer learning system that promotes stakeholder alignment, a focus on results, and access to learning opportunities, particularly…

Education

Massachusetts Nonprofit Network

Strengthen nonprofit sector through public policy, public awareness, and capacity building services.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mass Insight Education and Research and the most unlike its peers is John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/16

Grantees still filing

10/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$886,000Education$343,000Youth Development$290,000Health$265,000Philanthropy$110,000Community Improvement$73,000Employment$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA26.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · Rockland Trust - Blue Hills Charitable · DCU for Kids · Boston Scientific Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Pwc Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CHASE ALICE P TR UIND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ALPFA Foundation Inc.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 77.0× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 861118036 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ALPFA Foundation Inc, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 8% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Chase Alice P Tr Uind?

Find your warmest path to Chase Alice P Tr Uind through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CHASE ALICE P TR UIND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Chase Alice P Tr Uind?

More from the funding graph

CHASE ALICE P TR UIND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Chase Alice P Tr Uind?

More from the funding graph