· Public charity
Chasdei Yisroel Inc
To benefit needy individuals and their families; to promote, foster, increase and advance the health, welfare and economic status of low income families and to encourage and foster jewish religious activities and observance.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $1,093,600 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,314,105 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,220,505 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $81k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $212k
- $250k+1 grant · $775k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONGREGATION OLAM CHESED INC | $775,000 |
| KEHILAS BAIS YISROEL | $117,800 |
| YESHIVA TORAS YISROEL | $93,750 |
| CHAVIVA FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| TZIDKUS AVROHOM BEINISH INC | $21,200 |
| KEREN ZICHRON TZVI GEMACH | $15,000 |
| TORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLS | $14,500 |
| CONGREGATION GUR ARYEH INSTITUTE | $9,600 |
| YESHIVA EVEN YISROEL | $9,250 |
| ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $151k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $170k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- COCONGREGATION OLAM CHESED INC4× · 2020–2024 · $5.1M
- KBKEHILAS BAIS YISROEL3× · 2022–2024 · $216k
- CYCONGREGATION YESHIVA OF TELSHE ALUMNI3× · 2020–2023 · $120k
Funded once
- CFCDL FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $4.0M · revenue -62% · 95% of their budget
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF AHAVAS SHALOM INCone grant, 2020 · $152k
- CACONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INCone grant, 2020 · $103k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious School
A post-secondary school offering an educational program in talmudic study
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Congregation beth-el sephardic center of jamaica estates is a religious institution
A jewish secondary school which seeks to inculcate its students with high character and religious values to produce future religious leaders
Religious Teaching
To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.
Provide college level education and extensive background of jewish law and talmudic studies and rabbinical ordination.
Operate and maintain a college level educational institution teaching talmudic and rabbinical studies
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tzidkus Avrohom Beinish Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Matan Baseser Foundation Co Moshe Kestenbaum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CDL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Yeshiva Tiferes Yisroel ↗
- Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SOCIETY FOR HEBREW DAY SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHAVIVA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA OF FAR ROCKAWAY ↗
- Who funds KEREN EZER LNEFESH ↗
- Who funds TZIDKUS AVROHOM BEINISH INC ↗
- Who funds YAD CHAYA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Maalot · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Donors Fund Inc · Keren Yehuda Zvi Foundation · Otzar Hachesed Foundation Trust · The Basch Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chasdei Yisroel Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Tashbar of Lakewood Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.