Skip to content

· Public charity

Charlotte Sports Foundation

The Charlotte Sports Foundation is a non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization created in 2013 to provide leadership for sports-based initiatives that enhance the economy and quality of life in the Charlotte region.

$21M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$2.6M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$75MYouth Development$154kPublic Benefit$150k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $8,276,196, the rows itemized in this filing. The $20,639,154 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,362,958 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $500k
  • $250k+6 grants · $7.8M
$291,685
Median grant
8
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Virginia Tech University$2,600,000
University of Minnesota$2,450,000
Atlantic Coast Conference$1,851,140
University of Oklahoma$300,000
University of Michigan$291,685
University of Florida$283,371
University of Iowa$200,000
NC State Treasurer$150,000
University of South Carolina$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%University of Minnesota: $2.5M → 11%The Big 12 Conference Inc: $239k → 14%University of Oklahoma: $300k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $5.0M → 16%University of South Carolina: $1.1M → 16%University of Iowa: $200k → 15%MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $300k → 14%SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE: $2.3M → 16%ESPN Inc: $250k → 11%NC State Treasurer: $150k → 8%100 BLACK MEN OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INC: $154k → 10%NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY: $740k → 11%University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: $1.2M → 13%NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY: $493k → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $5.0M → 27%NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $25k → 16%WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $1.1M → 19%THE BIG TEN CONFERENCE: $700k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $2.5M → 8%Virginia Tech University: $2.6M → 21%MARYLAND UNIVERSITY: $2.5M → 11%UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $300k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $520k → 16%University of Iowa: $175k → 15%University of Michigan: $292k → 14%SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE: $2.3M → 16%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2.6M → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $521k → 13%ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE: $5.2M → 16%Virginia Tech University: $150k → 21%University of Oklahoma: $296k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $500k → 16%University of Michigan: $292k → 14%SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE: $2.3M → 16%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $502k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $300k → 13%Atlantic Coast Conference: $4.8M → 16%University of South Carolina: $150k → 16%SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE: $2.3M → 16%ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE: $4.4M → 16%ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE: $4.3M → 16%ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE: $2.3M → 16%ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE: $2.2M → 16%ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE: $2.2M → 16%Atlantic Coast Conference: $1.9M → 16%ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE: $883k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
IA
IN
CT
KY
WV
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$51M · 10 repeat orgs$25M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +98% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
15

Total granted

$51M
$23M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+24%

Still filing today

20%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28M · revenue +98%
  • SC
    SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE
    4× · 2017–2022 · $9.2M · revenue +71%
  • NS
    NC STATE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2018–2025 · $3.3M

Funded once

  • CU
    CLEMSON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2022 · $5.0M
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
    one grant, 2022 · $5.0M
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2020 · $2.5M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast Conference

The conference is committed to providing quality athletics competition integral to and consistent with its member institutions' academic missions. the conference is dedicated to providing opportunities for student-athletes to achieve their…

—
2
New England Collegiate Conference Inc

The mission of the NECC is to provide for athletic competition among institutions that share similar academic aspirations and are committed to the importance of the total educational experience for students engaged in sports.The NECC…

—
3
Western Athletic Conference

The conference is committed to providing student-athletes an exemplary university experience - both on and off the field of play. with high standards of integrity at the core of our athletic and academic excellences, our goal is to unlock…

Recreation & Sports
4
Presidents Athletic Conference

The organization operates an inter-collegiate athletic conference in 23 college sports for 12 member and 2 associate member schools. The 12 member schools are Allegheny College, Bethany College, Chatham University, Franciscan University,…

Philanthropy
5
American Athletic Conference

The american conference's mission is to provide students with the highest quality education and level of competition. working together with a collective strength and spirit, our universities are committed to our students' health and…

—
6
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
7
The Midwest Conference Inc

The midwest conference is an interstate league among similarly minded institutions - those which give primary attention to the educational purposes of athletics. member institutions believe that participation in sport enhances the…

Recreation & Sports
8
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
9
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
10
The Southern Conference

To facilitate intercollegiate athletics competition for both men and women, promote a proper balance between academics and athletics, foster integrity and excellence in both athletics and academics, foster competitive amateur opportunities…

—
11
Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference Inc

The mission of the conference is to enhance intercollegiate competition among its member institutions and to focus on the welfare of the student athlete. the conference and its members are dedicated to upholding the highest standards of…

Education
12
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlantic Coast Conference; the most unlike its peers is 100 Black Men of Charlotte Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $5,037,287 · OtherCLEMSON UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $5,037,287 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIANC STATE UNIVERSITY: $3,251,521 · OtherNC STATE UNIVERSITYVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY: $2,750,000 · OtherVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $2,502,738 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIAMARYLAND UNIVERSITY: $2,450,000 · OtherMARYLAND UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $2,450,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $2,427,200 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKYUSC School of Medicine Greenville: $2,275,226 · OtherUSC School of Medicine GreenvilleUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $2,044,537 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL+12 more: $8,071,751 · Other+12 moreATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE: $28,048,253 · Recreation & SportsATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCESOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE: $9,172,185 · Recreation & SportsSOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE+1 more: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE BIG 12 CONFERENCE INC: $238,555 · Education
Other$38,297,547Recreation & Sports$37,245,438Education$238,555

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE: $28,048,253 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE: $9,172,185 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BIG TEN CONFERENCE INC: $700,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BIG 12 CONFERENCE INC: $238,555 over 1y, 0.1% of budget100 Black Men of Charlotte Inc: $154,162 over 1y, 44% of budgetNational Collegiate Athletic Association: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds THE BIG TEN CONFERENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BIG 12 CONFERENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds 100 Black Men of Charlotte Inc ↗
  • Who funds National Collegiate Athletic Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Collegiate Athletic AssociationIN15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charlotte Sports Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charlotte Sports Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charlotte Sports’ filings →

    More from the funding graph