Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charlie and del Major Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$137k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0171% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$615kEducation$67kHealth$39kYouth Development$21kCivil Rights$5kPhilanthropy$3kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $125k
$12,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$220k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,000
AGUDAS ISRAEL OF BALTIMORE$25,000
Individual grant recipient$17,500
YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF SOUTH MONSEY$12,500
KESSER TORAH$12,500
KOLLEL D'BALTIMORE$12,000
SHEARITH ISRAEL CONGREGATION$10,000
TORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLS$10,000
HEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TORAH DAY SCHOOL OF ATLANTA$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 53% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%TALMUDICAL YESHIVA OF PHILADELPHIA: $7k → 22%YESHIVA MERCAZ HAT: $18k → 6%CAMP YESHIVA STATEN ISLAND: $21k → 11%TORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLS: $10k → 13%YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF SOUTH MONSEY: $13k → 14%CONGREGATION KEREN HAMACH: $10k → 20%ADAS: $22k → 14%CONGREGATION ZICHRON BINYAMIN: $55k → 11%TALMUDICAL ACADEMY: $27k → 11%AGUDAS ISRAEL OF BALTIMORE: $25k → 19%ADAS: $7k → 14%CONGREGATION ZICHRON BINYAMIN: $40k → 11%TALMUDICAL ACADEMY: $19k → 11%KOLLEL D'BALTIMORE: $21k → 19%TORAS ZEEV: $20k → 11%KESSER TORAH: $13k → 11%SHEARITH ISREAL CONGREGATION: $21k → 19%FRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM: $11k → 20%BAIS MEDRASH GEVOHA: $20k → 11%TALMUDICAL ACADEMY: $10k → 11%AGUDATH YISROEL OF BALTIMORE: $20k → 19%BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA: $20k → 11%BAIS YAAKOV: $18k → 19%ZICHRON BINYAMIN CONGREGATION: $16k → 11%AGUDAS YISRAEL OF BALTIMORE: $18k → 19%ZICHRON BINYAMIN CONGREGATION: $15k → 11%AGUDAS YISRAEL OF BALTIMORE: $15k → 19%CHEDER TORAS ZEV: $15k → 11%AGUDAS YISRAEL OF BALTIMORE: $15k → 19%BAIS MEDRASH GEVOHA: $12k → 11%KOLLEL D'BALTIMORE: $14k → 19%SHEARITH ISREAL CONGREGATION: $14k → 19%KOLLEL D'BALTIMORE: $14k → 19%TORAH INSTITUTE: $14k → 11%KOLLEL D'BALTIMORE: $12k → 19%TORAH INSTITUTE: $13k → 11%SHEARITH ISRAEL CONGREGATION: $10k → 19%TORAH INSTITUTE: $10k → 11%CONGREGATION CHOFETZ CHAIM ADAS: $10k → 19%TORAH INSTITUTE: $9k → 11%KOLLEL M'KADSHEI SHVREIE INC: $10k → 19%AGUDAS YISRAEL OF BALTIMORE: $10k → 19%BAIS YAAKOV: $10k → 19%AGUDAS YISRAEL OF BALTIMORE: $10k → 19%AGUDATH ISRAEL OF BALTIMORE: $8k → 19%CONGREGATION CHOFETZ CHAIM ADAS: $8k → 19%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERITY - WHITING: $25k → 19%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $20k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
PA
NJ
MO
MD
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$687k · 24 repeat orgs$302k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
37

Total granted

$687k
$222k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+10%

Still filing today

4%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CZ
    CONGREGATION ZICHRONE BINYAMIN
    2× · 2023–2024 · $95k
  • AY
    AGUDAS YISRAEL OF BALTIMORE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $67k
  • KD
    KOLLEL D BALTIMORE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $61k

Funded once

  • CY
    CAMP YESHIVA STATEN ISLAND
    one grant, 2024 · $21k
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +51%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
Yeshiva Ohr Yisrael of Atlanta Inc

Inspire and assist each student in his quest to nurture a personal relationship with hashem, develop and refine his character, immerse himself in serious torah scholarship and attain the knowledge and skills necessary to be an articulate…

Education
6
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
7
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
8
Bais Medrash Mayan Hatorah

To provide religious education and services to our students in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
9
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
10
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
11
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
12
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hebrew Academy of Cleveland; the most unlike its peers is Mesivta Yeshiva of Chestnut Ridge. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION ZICHRONE BINYAMIN: $95,000 · OtherCONGREGATION ZICHRONE BINYAMINAGUDAS YISRAEL OF BALTIMORE: $67,200 · OtherAGUDAS YISRAEL OF BALTIMOREKOLLEL D BALTIMORE INC: $61,300 · OtherKOLLEL D BALTIMORE INCTORAH INSTITUTE: $60,500 · OtherTORAH INSTITUTETALMUDICAL ACADEMY: $56,250 · OtherTALMUDICAL ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient: $49,000 · OtherBAIS YAAKOV SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $38,000 · OtherADAS: $35,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $32,000 · Other+48 more: $412,025 · Other+48 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationCHEDER TORAS ZEV: $15,000 · EducationMESIVTA YESHIVA OF CHESTNUT RIDGE: $6,000 · EducationTORAH DAY SCHOOL OF ATLANTA: $5,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM: $11,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $4,800 · InternationalGEMACH CHESSED INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$941,775Education$46,500International$15,800Philanthropy$3,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND: $18,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHEDER TORAS ZEV: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM: $11,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMESIVTA YESHIVA OF CHESTNUT RIDGE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTORAH DAY SCHOOL OF ATLANTA: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $4,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEMACH CHESSED INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds CHEDER TORAS ZEV ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM ↗
  • Who funds MESIVTA YESHIVA OF CHESTNUT RIDGE ↗
  • Who funds TORAH DAY SCHOOL OF ATLANTA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY25.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Milton & Libbey Davis Foundation Inc · The Tzedakah Fund · Donald D Rogers Foundation Inc · Gutman Family Foundation Inc · The Adar Foundation · Terumah Foundation Inc · Tidewater Jewish Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charlie and del Major Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charlie and del Major Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Cheder Toras Zev: 22% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Charlie and del Major Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Charlie and del Major Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charlie and del Major’s filings →

More from the funding graph