Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles W Loosemore Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$275k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$700kArts & Culture$290kFood & Nutrition$74kHealth$46kEnvironment$31kCrime & Legal$15kAnimals$7kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $47k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Feeding America West Michigan$100,000
Grand Valley State University$100,000
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Jimmy$15,000
The Caridad Center$11,750
Interlochen Center for the Arts$10,000
Center for Women in Law$10,000
Alice James Books$5,000
Detroit Public Theatre$5,000
St John's United Method Church$5,000
The Arts Garage$2,750
Eat Better Live Better Inc$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Corner Shower and Laundry$1,500
The Oasis Center$1,000
Atlanta Community Food Bank$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The Caridad Center: $12k → 11%The Caridad Center: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 15 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$1.4M
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
0%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ARTIS-NAPLES INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $170k · revenue +14%
  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN
    4× · 2022–2025 · $170k · revenue +27%
  • DETROIT PUBLIC THEATRE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • GR
    GRAND RAPIDS PUBLIC MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +74%
  • WM
    Western Michigan Alliance for Veter
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • TP
    The Piedmont Park Conservation Soci
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
3
Virginia Peninsula Foodbank

To distribute food effectively through collaborative efforts that minimize hunger, promote nutrition and encourage self-reliance through education.

Food & Nutrition
4
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
5
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
6
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
7
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
8
Arizona Opera Company

Arizona opera elevates the transformative power of storytelling through music - cultivating community and strengthening a state and people as adventurous and diverse as the place they call home.

Arts & Culture
9
Arizona Humane Society

We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.

Animals
10
Northern Illinois Food Bank

With the support of our community, we provide over 90 million meals annually through our network of over 900 member food pantries and programs across thirteen counties, currently reaching over a half million individuals each month with…

Food & Nutrition
11
Akron-Canton Regional Foodbank

The mission of the akron-canton regional foodbank is to lead a collaborative network that empowers people to experience healthy and hunger-free lives. we distribute food to feed people and we advocate, engage and convene our community in…

Food & Nutrition
12
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vista Maria; the most unlike its peers is Artis-Naples Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $800,000 · OtherGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $170,000 · OtherFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN+15 more: $138,250 · Other+15 moreARTIS-NAPLES INC: $170,000 · Arts & CultureARTIS-NAPLES INCINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $60,000 · Arts & CultureINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR …GRAND RAPIDS PUBLIC MUSEUM: $50,000 · Arts & CultureGRAND RAPIDS PUBLIC MUS…DETROIT PUBLIC THEATRE: $20,000 · Arts & CultureDETROIT PUBLIC THEATRECaridad Center Inc: $22,750 · Human ServicesCorner Shower and LaundryInc: $3,500 · Human ServicesEat Better Live Better Inc: $6,500 · PhilanthropyDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $1,000 · AnimalsBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $1,000 · AnimalsOASIS CENTER INC: $1,000 · Community ImprovementATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,108,250Arts & Culture$300,000Human Services$26,250Philanthropy$6,500Animals$2,000Community Improvement$1,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC: $170,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $170,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS PUBLIC MUSEUM: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCaridad Center Inc: $22,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC THEATRE: $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetALICE JAMES POETRY COOPERATIVE: $10,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetEat Better Live Better Inc: $6,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCorner Shower and LaundryInc: $3,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetOASIS CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA MARIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RAPIDS PUBLIC MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Caridad Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds ALICE JAMES POETRY COOPERATIVE ↗
  • Who funds Eat Better Live Better Inc ↗
  • Who funds Corner Shower and LaundryInc ↗
  • Who funds OASIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds VISTA MARIA ↗
  • Who funds DANNY & RONS RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles W Loosemore Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles W Loosemore Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Caridad Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles W Loosemore’s filings →

More from the funding graph