Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles Pankow Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$354k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$4.6MEducation$4.3MPhilanthropy$130kEnvironment$68kCrime & Legal$62kRecreation & Sports$33kHuman Services$23kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $288k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $395k
  • $250k+1 grant · $354k
$25,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$353,500
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$150,000
UCLA$75,000
UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO$68,961
COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES$51,000
RDH BUILDING SCIENCE INC$50,000
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$49,331
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY$48,000
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$43,810
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA$26,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO$25,416
CAL POLY$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$20,000
FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $354k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $100k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO: $86k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $49k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO: $160k → 16%CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $82k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS: $146k → 15%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $150k → 18%COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES: $51k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $95k → 12%UINVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $33k → 13%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: $344k → 6%AGC OF AMERICA: $80k → 7%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $230k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $132k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO: $69k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO: $85k → 16%CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $38k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS: $107k → 15%COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES: $51k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $428k → 9%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: $94k → 6%AGC OF AMERICA: $40k → 7%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $230k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $63k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO: $55k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO: $60k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS CENTER FOR RESEARCH INC: $105k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $252k → 9%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: $77k → 6%SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER: $62k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $48k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS CENTER FOR RESEARCH INC: $60k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $140k → 9%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: $61k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $42k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $100k → 9%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: $46k → 6%UC BERKELEY: $38k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $87k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $76k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $50k → 9%RDH BUILDING SCIENCE INC: $50k → 16%UCLA: $75k → 14%UCLA: $75k → 14%UCLA: $75k → 14%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $55k → 14%SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER: $271k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
NM
KS
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.2M · 37 repeat orgs$727k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
21

Total granted

$8.2M
$537k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+34%

Still filing today

35%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $190k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationScience & TechHealthPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2024 · $833k · revenue +110%
  • UO
    University of Kansas Center for Research Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $205k · revenue +44%
  • TC
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $125k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • SG
    SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER
    one grant, 2022 · $271k
  • SG
    SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $62k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN
    one grant, 2018 · $49k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
Illinois Institute of Technology

To provide distinctive and relevant education in an environment of scientific, technological, and professional knowledge creation and innovation.

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
7
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
8
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
9
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
10
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
11
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
12
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University; the most unlike its peers is Magnusson Klemencic Associates Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $1,200,305 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $1,182,672 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONAMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: $681,490 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERSPURDUE UNIVERSITY - SPONSORED PROGRAM SERVICES: $509,000 · OtherPURDUE UNIVERSITY - SPONSORED PROGRAM SERVICESUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $435,951 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATIUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO: $353,563 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS: $335,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $299,466 · OtherSIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER: $271,150 · Other+36 more: $2,277,281 · Other+36 moreNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $832,500 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNI…THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $124,778 · EducationTHE CATHOLIC UNI…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $115,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRU…The Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $100,805 · EducationThe Research Fou…+7 more: $141,500 · Education+7 moreUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc: $205,000 · Science & Tech+3 more: $15,000 · Science & TechFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $125,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $2,500 · Community ImprovementGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $12,600 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation: $3,000 · HealthEMERSON HOSPITAL: $3,000 · HealthNATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM: $15,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $8,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$7,545,878Education$1,314,583Science & Tech$220,000Community Improvement$127,500Health$18,600Arts & Culture$15,000Food & Nutrition$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $832,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc: $205,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $125,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $124,778 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $115,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $100,805 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACE MENTOR PROGRAM OF CONNECTICUT INC: $40,000 over 7y, 28% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $32,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAL POLY CORPORATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $22,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACE Mentor Los Angeles Metropolitan Area Inc: $14,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $12,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATIONS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCPI FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRCI-IIBEC FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSEAOC FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BUILDING SCIENCES: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEMERSON HOSPITAL: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF CONSTRUCTION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDOUGLAS COUNTY VISITING NURSES ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Kansas Center for Research Inc ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds ACE MENTOR PROGRAM OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds CAL POLY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA2.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles Pankow Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles Pankow Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Emerson Hospital: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Charles Pankow Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Charles Pankow Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles Pankow’s filings →

More from the funding graph