Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles I Brown Foundation

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$111k
Granted FY2017
29
Grants FY2017
5
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k22 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $79k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$15,687
NEW ISRAEL FUND$12,500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ENVIRONM$10,323
GRACEENDCHILDPOVERTYCA$10,000
AFTAU$10,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY$10,000
CALIFORNI STATE UNIVERSITY - LA UAS$10,000
NORTH AMERICAN CONF ON ETHIOPIAN JE$7,000
NORTH AMERICAN CONF ON ETHIOPIAN JE$6,880
NORTH AMERICAN CONF ON ETHIOPIAN JE$5,000
BREAST CANCER CARE RESEARCH FUND$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF LOS ANGELES$1,000
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$1,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIV$1,000
HAND IN HAND$1,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%INNOCENT PROJECT: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Bridges to Justice

In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…

Crime & Legal
2
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
3
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
4
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
5
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
6
Auschwitz Institute for the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities

The auschwitz institute for the prevention of genocide and mass atrocities is dedicated to building a world that prevents genocide. we aim to see every state effectively integrate within government the domestically developed function of…

International
7
Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc

The middle east media research institute (memri) explores the middle east through its media, providing timely translations from arabic, farsi, urdu, pashtu, and turkish media and publishing original analysis of political, ideological,…

International
8
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
9
The Interfaith Alliance Foundation Inc

Interfaith alliance is a growing network of people of diverse faiths and beliefs across the country working together to build a resilient democracy and fulfill america's promise of religious freedom and civil rights not just for some, but…

Religion
10
The American Islamic Forum for Democracy

Aifd's mission is to advocate for the preservation of the founding principles of our u.s. constitution, liberty, and freedom, through the separation of mosque and state. public engagement program provides education to the general public on…

International
11
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
12
Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc

UUSC advances human rights and social justice around the world, partnering with those who confront unjust power structures and mobilizing to challenge oppressive policies. Our work is grounded in the belief that all people have inherent…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Jewish World Service Inc; the most unlike its peers is Smith River Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH AMERICAN CONF ON ETHIOPIAN JE: $18,880 · OtherNORTH AMERICAN CONF ON ETHIOPIAN JETHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,687 · OtherTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ENVIRONM: $10,323 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ENVIRONMAFTAU: $10,000 · OtherAFTAUGRACEENDCHILDPOVERTYCA: $10,000 · OtherGRACEENDCHILDPOVERTYCACALIFORNI STATE UNIVERSITY - LA UAS: $10,000 · OtherCALIFORNI STATE UNIVERSITY - LA UASAMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITYBREAST CANCER CARE RESEARCH FUND: $5,000 · Other+10 more: $4,900 · OtherNEW ISRAEL FUND: $12,500 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $1,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIEND…AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $1,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH…T'RUAH: $1,000 · InternationalT'RUAH+2 more: $200 · InternationalTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $500 · Human ServicesSmith River Alliance Inc: $250 · EnvironmentWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $250 · Education
Other$94,790International$15,700Human Services$500Environment$250Education$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,687 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetT'RUAH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTeach Democracy: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSmith River Alliance Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WATER PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds T'RUAH ↗
  • Who funds Teach Democracy ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Smith River Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WATER PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles I Brown Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles I Brown Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles I Brown’s filings →

    More from the funding graph