Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles Dicroce Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$128kEducation$95kPhilanthropy$17kHuman Services$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kYouth Development$1kInternational$1kReligion$500
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$679k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERRIMACK COLLEGE$20,000
JUPITER MEDICAL CTR FOUNDATION$15,000
MGH FUND$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$1,000
WOUNDED WARRIORS$500
MARCH OF DIMES$500
ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$500
FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION$500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$247k · 11 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +112% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$247k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+112%
+26%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $96k · revenue +158%
  • MERRIMACK COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +77%
  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $3k · revenue +139%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF HENDERSON
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • MC
    MIDDLETON CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $500
  • SMILE TRAIN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $250 · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc

JMCPG is committed to providing compassionate, personalized care from the region's most trusted team of physicians and health care professionals. Across the Palm Beaches and the Treasure Coast of Florida, JMCPG practice locations offer…

Health
2
Jupiter Medical Center Inc

The mission of jupiter medical center is to deliver excellent and compassionate healthcare advancing the well-being of the people we serve, regardless of their ability to pay. certain services are provided at a loss or at no payment…

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
9
Mount Sinai Community Foundation

To improve the health of the community it serves by ensuring the availability of medical, surgical, and primary care physicians and advanced practice providers and high quality healthcare services.

—
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Sarasota Memorial Healthcare Foundation Inc

Sarasota memorial healthcare foundation is the philanthropic partner that helps sarasota memorial health care system bring world-class care to our community.

Health
12
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $95,500 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyMERRIMACK COLLEGE: $90,000 · EducationMERRIMACK COLLEGEFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $3,200 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationMASS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $25,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL HOSPITALMGH FUND: $15,000 · OtherMGH FUNDCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $3,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $3,450 · OtherST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPI…WOUNDED WARRIORS: $3,450 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIORS+3 more: $1,750 · OtherMARCH OF DIMES INC: $3,450 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$97,500Education$95,200Other$52,150Health$3,450Human Services$2,500Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $95,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMERRIMACK COLLEGE: $90,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $3,450 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $3,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Hills Community Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MERRIMACK COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Hills Community Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles Dicroce Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles Dicroce Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Merrimack College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles Dicroce Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph