Skip to content
Charles Deere Wiman Memorial Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx at a glance

· Private foundation

Charles Deere Wiman Memorial Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$46kYouth Development$39kHealth$25kCommunity Improvement$23kFood & Nutrition$20kEducation$18kHousing & Shelter$12kPhilanthropy$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$574k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOLINE FOUNDATION$6,667
YOUTH HOPE FOUNDATION$3,000
SPRING FORWARD LEARNING CENTER$2,500
STEAM ON WHEELS$2,500
WVIK QUAD CITIES NPR$2,500
TWO RIVERS YMCA$2,050
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$2,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA$2,000
NARRATIVES QC$1,500
EVERY CHILD SUCCEEDS$1,400
HAND IN HAND$1,200
GRIFFITH MOLINE HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
BETHANY FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES$1,000
MOLINE KIWANIS CLUB$1,000
NAHANT MARSH EDUCATION CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%EVERY CHILD SUCCEEDS: $5k → 16%EVERY CHILD SUCCEEDS: $4k → 16%EVERY CHILD SUCCEEDS: $2k → 16%EVERY CHILD SUCCEEDS: $1k → 16%BETHANY FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $4k → 15%BETHANY FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $3k → 15%BETHANY FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$168k · 21 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
5

Total granted

$168k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+12%

Still filing today

76%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEducationHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHRISTIAN CARE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $17k · revenue +39%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +67%
  • MC
    MOLINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $14k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • AO
    ACR OF THE QUAD CITIES
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • FR
    FAMILY RESOURCES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -5%
  • MO
    MERCADO ON 5TH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +180%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Men's Christian Association

We build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities with a primary focus on youth activities and programs.

Human Services
2
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
3
Family Health Center of Boone County

To provide access to primary medical, dental and mental health services for community members, with emphasis on the medically underserved, to improve the health of the community and to train future health care providers.

—
4
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
5
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
6
Hope Haven Inc

As followers of christ, hope haven's mission is to empower individuals with disabilities through work and life skills so that they may enjoy a productive life in their community.

—
7
Mid-Iowa Community Action Inc

Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.

Community Improvement
8
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
9
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
10
For the Children

To transform lives and communities by providing an array of programs, all directed toward changing the lives of children in the foster care system aimed to prevent academic failure, drug abuse, teen pregnancy, sex trafficking,…

Recreation & Sports
11
Big Brothers-Big Sisters of Metropolitan Chicago

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite and empower the promise of youth. we nurture children, strengthen communities and believe that inherent in every child is the ability to succeed and thrive in life.

—
12
Edward C Mazique Parent Child Center Inc of the District of Columbia

To achieve better outcomes for children in partnership with families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bethany for Children & Families; the most unlike its peers is Christian Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWA: $14,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWAGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS INC: $14,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS INCThe Youth Hope Foundation: $12,000 · OtherThe Youth Hope FoundationTwo Rivers YMCA Inc: $8,050 · OtherTwo Rivers YMCA IncHAND IN HAND: $6,200 · OtherHAND IN HANDJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT: $5,500 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENTCHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER OF THE QUAD CITIES NFP: $5,100 · OtherGRIFFITH MOLINE HIGH SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherACR OF THE QUAD CITIES: $5,000 · OtherFAMILY RESOURCES INC: $5,000 · OtherMOLINE KIWANIS CLUB: $4,500 · OtherTHE MIDWEST WRITING CENTER: $3,500 · Other+6 more: $13,700 · Other+6 moreMOLINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $13,500 · Community ImprovementMOLINE COMMUN…MOLINE FOUNDATION: $6,667 · Community ImprovementMOLINE FOUNDA…MERCADO ON 5TH INC: $4,000 · Community ImprovementMERCADO ON 5T…RIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR: $19,500 · Food & NutritionRIVER BEND …Every Child Succeeds: $11,900 · Human ServicesEvery Child…BETHANY FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $7,500 · Human ServicesBETHANY FOR…CHRISTIAN CARE: $16,500 · Housing & ShelterCHRISTIAN…SPRING FORWARD LEARNING CENTER: $5,000 · EducationAUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $2,500 · EducationSTEAM ON WHEELS: $2,500 · EducationALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · HealthMOLINE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $3,316 · Health
Other$101,550Community Improvement$24,167Food & Nutrition$19,500Human Services$19,400Housing & Shelter$16,500Education$10,000Health$8,316

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR: $19,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CARE: $16,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWA: $14,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMOLINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $13,500 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetThe Youth Hope Foundation: $12,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetEvery Child Succeeds: $11,900 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTwo Rivers YMCA Inc: $8,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOLINE FOUNDATION: $6,667 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER OF THE QUAD CITIES NFP: $5,100 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPRING FORWARD LEARNING CENTER: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERCADO ON 5TH INC: $4,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE MIDWEST WRITING CENTER: $3,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetMOLINE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $3,316 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetEVERYCHILD: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAHANT MARSH EDUCATION CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Moline FoundationQuad Cities Community…Doris & Victor Day Fo…Quad Cities Golf Clas…Rauch Family Foundati…The Rock Island Commu…United Way Quad CitiesScott County Regional…Roy J Carver Charitab…Grant & Virginia Bris…Harold R Bechtel Char…Hubbell-Waterman Fndn
Moline FoundationIL32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Moline Foundation · Quad Cities Community Foundation · Doris & Victor Day Foundation Inc · Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation · Rauch Family Foundation I Inc · The Rock Island Community Foundation · United Way Quad Cities · Scott County Regional Authority · Roy J Carver Charitable Trust · Grant & Virginia Brissman Foundation Nfp · Harold R Bechtel Charitable Trust · Hubbell-Waterman Fndn

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles Deere Wiman Memorial Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles Deere Wiman Memorial Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles Deere Wiman Memorial Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home