· Private foundation
Charles Deere Wiman Memorial Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOLINE FOUNDATION | $6,667 |
| YOUTH HOPE FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| STEAM ON WHEELS | $2,500 |
| WVIK QUAD CITIES NPR | $2,500 |
| SPRING FORWARD LEARNING CENTER | $2,500 |
| TWO RIVERS YMCA | $2,050 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA | $2,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS | $2,000 |
| NARRATIVES QC | $1,500 |
| EVERY CHILD SUCCEEDS | $1,400 |
| HAND IN HAND | $1,200 |
| BETHANY FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES | $1,000 |
| MOLINE KIWANIS CLUB | $1,000 |
| GRIFFITH MOLINE HIGH SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| NAHANT MARSH EDUCATION CENTER | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCHRISTIAN CARE5× · 2020–2024 · $17k · revenue +39%
- BBBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWA6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +67%
- MCMOLINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION5× · 2020–2024 · $14k · revenue +97%
Funded once
- FRFAMILY RESOURCES INCone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -5%
- AOACR OF THE QUAD CITIESone grant, 2021 · $5k
- MOMERCADO ON 5TH INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +180%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities with a primary focus on youth activities and programs.
Children's services
To provide access to primary medical, dental and mental health services for community members, with emphasis on the medically underserved, to improve the health of the community and to train future health care providers.
Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
As followers of christ, hope haven's mission is to empower individuals with disabilities through work and life skills so that they may enjoy a productive life in their community.
Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.
To transform lives and communities by providing an array of programs, all directed toward changing the lives of children in the foster care system aimed to prevent academic failure, drug abuse, teen pregnancy, sex trafficking,…
Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite and empower the promise of youth. we nurture children, strengthen communities and believe that inherent in every child is the ability to succeed and thrive in life.
To achieve better outcomes for children in partnership with families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bethany for Children & Families and the most unlike its peers is Christian Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 54. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 11% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CARE ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWA ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds MOLINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds The Youth Hope Foundation ↗
- Who funds Every Child Succeeds ↗
- Who funds Two Rivers YMCA Inc ↗
- Who funds BETHANY FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds MOLINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER OF THE QUAD CITIES NFP ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds SPRING FORWARD LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds MERCADO ON 5TH INC ↗
- Who funds THE MIDWEST WRITING CENTER ↗
- Who funds MOLINE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EVERYCHILD ↗
- Who funds STEAM ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds AUGUSTANA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NAHANT MARSH EDUCATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Moline Foundation · Quad Cities Community Foundation · Doris & Victor Day Foundation Inc · Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation · Rauch Family Foundation I Inc · The Rock Island Community Foundation · United Way Quad Cities · Scott County Regional Authority · Roy J Carver Charitable Trust · Grant & Virginia Brissman Foundation Nfp · Harold R Bechtel Charitable Trust · Hubbell-Waterman Fndn
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Charles Deere Wiman Memorial Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.