Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Charles D Ortgiesen Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Arts & Culture$302kEducation$123kHousing & Shelter$43kHuman Services$39kHealth$32kEnvironment$24kReligion$8kCrime & Legal$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARCUS SCHOOL$10,000
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC$10,000
MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC$8,500
MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER$8,000
LIFESTRIDERS$5,000
MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION$3,000
FIRST STAGE$2,500
WELLPOINT CARE NETWORK$2,000
LITERACY SERVICES OF MILWAUKEE$2,000
FRIENDS OF BOERNER BOTANICAL GARDENS$2,000
RISEN SAVIOR YOUTH SERVICES$2,000
MILWAUKEE BALLET$1,500
URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER$1,500
CENTER FOR DEAF-BLIND PERSONS$1,500
RENAISSANCE THEATERWORKS$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE: $2k → 17%SERENITY INNS INC: $1k → 17%SERENITY INNS INC: $1k → 17%SERENITY INNS INC: $1k → 17%SERENITY INNS INC: $1k → 17%ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $5k → 17%SERENITY INNS INC: $1k → 17%ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $2k → 17%INDEPENDENCE FIRST: $3k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE INC: $1k → 17%MILWAUKEE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE: $2k → 17%MILWAUKEE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 17%MILWAUKEE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 17%LUTHERAN COUNSELING & FAMILY SERVICES WISC: $1k → 17%SERENITY INNS: $1k → 17%SERENITY INNS: $1k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$546k · 35 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
16

Total granted

$546k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+26%

Still filing today

80%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $78k · revenue +20%
  • MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $69k · revenue +91%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BOERNER BOTANICAL GARDENS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • ST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +39%
  • INDEPENDENCE FIRST INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -20%
  • VISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Radio Milwaukee Inc

To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…

Arts & Culture
2
Milwaukee Public Theatre Inc

Making the arts accessible to all

—
3
Museum of Wisconsin Art Inc

The museum of wisconsin art celebrates the value, diversity, and uniqueness of the visual arts and artists of wisconsin. this is achieved by collecting, conserving, documenting, exhibiting, and promoting aesthetic understanding of the…

Arts & Culture
4
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
5
Nonprofit Center of Milwaukee Inc

To promote interests and effectiveness of the nonprofit sector through strengthening organizational capacity, expanding volunteerism and encouraging collaboration.

—
6
Montessori Institute of Milwaukee Inc

Montessori institute teaches and develops programs to montessori instructors to educate them as to montessori teaching methods

—
7
Milwaukee Excellence Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.

—
8
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
9
Milwaukee Community Service Corps Inc

The milwaukee community service corps (mcsc) is a non-profit vocational training organization providing employment, education and life skills to training youth adults and unemployed and underemployed of milwaukee, wisconsin.

Employment
10
Milwaukee Parks Foundation Inc

Engage our community in supporting milwaukee county parks to collectively steward a thriving park system.

Environment
11
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
12
Milwaukee Water Commons Inc

Milwaukee water commons is helping catalyze milwaukee as a true model water city-a place where we all have a stake in the health of our waters and all share in their stewardship and benefits. we are advancing our community envisioned water…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Stage Milwaukee and the most unlike its peers is Milwaukee Youth Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr17%2%10–20yr18%18%20–35yr15%33%35–55yr20%47%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr17%1%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr15%17%35–55yr20%60%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/47
the rest of the field
12%
710/5,741

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/44
Grantees still filing
30/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $77,500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INCMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $75,500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC — $68,500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INCFIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE — $15,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF BOERNER BOTANICAL GARDENS INC — $13,000 · Arts & CultureFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC — $13,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC — $12,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more — $31,500 · Arts & Culture+5 moreST MARCUS LUTHERAN CHURCH — $77,500 · OtherST MARCUS LUTHERAN CHURCHMILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION — $22,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSIONWELLPOINT CARE NETWORK INC — $11,000 · OtherWELLPOINT CARE NETWORK INCALMA CENTER INC — $8,500 · OtherLITERACY SERVICES OF MILWAUKEE — $7,000 · OtherHOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED — $8,000 · Other+15 more — $43,500 · Other+15 moreSERENITY INNS INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE — $7,000 · Human ServicesMILWAUKEE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesINDEPENDENCE FIRST INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOUSE INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN COUNSELING AND FAMILY SERVICES — $1,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR DEAF-BLIND PERSONS INC — $8,500 · HealthCURATIVE CARE NETWORK INC — $7,000 · HealthLIFESTRIDERS INC — $7,000 · HealthVISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED — $3,000 · HealthPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $1,000 · HealthLITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC — $9,500 · EducationST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC — $5,000 · EducationDISCOVERY WORLD LTD — $3,000 · EducationTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · EducationNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC — $13,000 · Recreation & SportsURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC — $11,000 · Environment
Arts & Culture$306,000Other$177,500Human Services$28,000Health$26,500Education$19,500Recreation & Sports$13,000Environment$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $77,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $75,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC — $68,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE — $15,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF BOERNER BOTANICAL GARDENS INC — $13,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC — $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC — $13,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC — $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC — $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWELLPOINT CARE NETWORK INC — $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRENAISSANCE THEATERWORKS INC — $9,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetLITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC — $9,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR DEAF-BLIND PERSONS INC — $8,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetALMA CENTER INC — $8,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCURATIVE CARE NETWORK INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFESTRIDERS INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSERENITY INNS INC — $7,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWISCONSIN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC — $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSKYLIGHT MUSIC THEATRE CORP — $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBENEDICT CENTER INC — $5,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCATHEDRAL CENTER INC — $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORIC MILWAUKEE INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOLS THAT CAN MILWAUKEE INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOUR NEXT GENERATION INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDISCOVERY WORLD LTD — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENCE FIRST INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDS OF HEALTH INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOURNEY HOUSE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN COUNSELING AND FAMILY SERVICES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Fou…Herbert H Kohl Charit…Evan & Marion Helfaer…Green Bay Packers Fou…Gardner FoundationUnited Way of Greater…Ralph Evinrude Founda…Anon Charitable TrustYouth Foundation IncBaird Foundation IncDorothy Inbusch Found…Joseph and Vera Zilbe…
Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI68.7× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Gardner Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Youth Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Dorothy Inbusch Foundation Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Charles D Ortgiesen Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Charles D Ortgiesen Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Charles D Ortgiesen Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines