Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Charles and Sherry Slinger Family Gift Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Human Services$38kHealth$36kInternational$30kEducation$28kYouth Development$28kRecreation & Sports$20kArts & Culture$14kReligion$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $24k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$152k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$100,000
TUSKEGEE AIRMAN INC$5,000
WINNEBAGO LUTHERAN ACADEMY$5,000
ORBIS$5,000
RAF RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATIO$3,000
FRIESLAND COMMUNITY CHURCH$2,000
KING MOUNTAIN GLIDER PARK$2,000
UNITED FLYING OCTOGENARIANS$1,000
KELCH AVIATION MUSEUM$1,000
Individual grant recipient$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RECREATION AVIATION FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%RAF RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATIO: $3k → 10%RECREATION AVIATION FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MT
IL
WI
NY
CO
VA
TN
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$196k · 16 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
3

Total granted

$196k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+61%

Still filing today

38%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +87%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $25k · revenue +59%
  • HC
    HERITAGE CAMPS FOR ADOPTIVE FAMILIES INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $6k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • KO
    KIWANIS OF FT COLLINS
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • FH
    FISHING HAS NO BOUNDARIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +61%
  • CH
    CHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $400 · revenue -7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Flight of Hope

Children's flight of hope (cfoh) provides flights to essential, life-changing, and life-saving medical care for children in need. together with our donors, partners, and champions, we help ease the emotional and financial burden on…

Health
2
Miracle Flights

Miracle flights is a national charity that provides free commercial airline tickets for u.s. residents in need of distant medical care not available in their own communities.

3
Oral Health International Foundation
4
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
5
Eyecare for Humanity
6
Operation of Hope Worldwide

Operation of Hope is a medical foundation that provides primarily cleft lip, cleft palate, facial reconstructive and general reconstructive surgery to children in Latin America, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Egypt and Mongolia. We care for the needy…

International
7
The Voom Foundation

FORM 990 - ORGANIZATION'S MISSIONWHO WE AREThe Vincent Obioma Ohaju Memorial (VOOM) Foundation was established toraise standard of care and create a sustainable medical program in Nigeria.VOOM Foundation was born from the vision of Dr.…

Health
8
Medical Missions Outreach Inc

In 2005, medical missions outreach began pointing others to the great physician through an annual medical missions trip to the developing world by partnering with local churches to reach their communities with the gospel. now more than 20…

International
9
Orthopterists' Society

The orthopterists' society (formerly the pan american acridological society) is an international scientific organization devoted to facilitating communication among those interested in orthoptera and related organisms, and to encourage…

10
Mission Flight

Our mission is to fly medical patients to critically needed appointments within California as well as to fly volunteer teams into remote, impoverished areas of Mexico. Our passion is to connect people who are isolated and in poverty with…

International
11
American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Inc

The american society of ophthalmic plastic and recontructive surgery (asoprs) was founded to establish a qualified body of surgeons who have training and experience in the highly specialized field of oculofacial plastic surgery. the…

12
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is Recreational Aviation Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKETTLE MORAIN YOUTH AVIATI — $27,800 · OtherKETTLE MORAIN YOUTH AVIATITUSKEGEE AIRMEN INC — $26,000 · OtherTUSKEGEE AIRMEN INCWINNEBAGO LUTHERAN ACADEMY — $15,000 · OtherWINNEBAGO LUTHERAN ACADEMYEAA AVIATION KMYA SCHOLARSHIP — $13,200 · OtherEAA AVIATION KMYA SCHOLARSHIPTHE SALVATION ARMY — $11,000 · OtherKELCH AVIATION MUSEUM — $8,000 · Other+7 more — $12,500 · Other+7 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $25,000 · HealthST JUDE CHIL…THE COLORADO MISSION OF MERCY — $8,000 · HealthTHE COLORADO…PROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC — $30,000 · InternationalPROJECT ORB…RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION — $13,000 · Human ServicesHERITAGE CAMPS FOR ADOPTIVE FAMILIES INC — $6,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED FLYING OCTOGENARIANS — $4,000 · Recreation & SportsCHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC — $400 · Religion
Other$213,500Health$33,000International$30,000Human Services$13,000Arts & Culture$6,000Recreation & Sports$4,000Religion$400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION — $13,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COLORADO MISSION OF MERCY — $8,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetHERITAGE CAMPS FOR ADOPTIVE FAMILIES INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED FLYING OCTOGENARIANS — $4,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetFISHING HAS NO BOUNDARIES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE COLORADO MISSION OF MERCY
  • Who funds HERITAGE CAMPS FOR ADOPTIVE FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds UNITED FLYING OCTOGENARIANS
  • Who funds FISHING HAS NO BOUNDARIES INC
  • Who funds CHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Charles and Sherry Slinger Family Gift Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Charles and Sherry Slinger Family Gift Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Charles and Sherry Slinger Family Gift Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph