Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charity Air Ambulance

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$19k
Granted FY2019
4
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Health$99kPhilanthropy$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kRecreation & Sports$3kCivil Rights$1kCrime & Legal$500Other$0
02FY2019 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$3,220
Median grant
1
States reached
$12k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC$13,300
EAST VALLEY FIREFIGHER CHARITIES$3,220
HOPE KIDS$1,485
SAN TAN YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MARICOPA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%LAW ENFORCEMENT HEROES: $500 → 14%SAN TAN YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $1k → 11%MARICOPA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%ARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC: $53k → 11%ARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC: $29k → 11%ARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC: $13k → 11%LIVE LIKE LEXI INC: $700 → 11%LIVE LIKE LEXI INC: $500 → 11%DAISY MOUNTAIN FIREFIGHTERS: $5k → 11%DAISY MOUNTAIN FIREFIGHTERS: $3k → 11%HOPE KIDS: $1k → 11%COUNTY HOSPITAL: $141 → 11%GILBERT YOUTH FOOTBALL LEAGUE: $1k → 11%SCOTTSDALE ACTIVE 2030 FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$106k · 4 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +370% since the first grant, against +197% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$106k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+370%
+197%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
HealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AB
    ARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $95k · revenue +4%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k
  • VH
    VALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +370%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • SC
    SAGUAROS CHILDRENS CHARITIESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +39%
  • GY
    GILBERT YOUTH FOOTBALL LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +197%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC: $95,112 · OtherARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+6 more: $6,561 · Other+6 moreSAGUAROS CHILDRENS CHARITIES: $5,000 · PhilanthropyVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthHOPEKIDS INC: $1,485 · HealthGILBERT YOUTH FOOTBALL LEAGUE: $1,100 · Youth Development
Other$116,173Philanthropy$5,000Health$3,485Youth Development$1,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC: $95,112 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetSAGUAROS CHILDRENS CHARITIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPEKIDS INC: $1,485 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGILBERT YOUTH FOOTBALL LEAGUE: $1,100 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAGUAROS CHILDRENS CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds VALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPEKIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds GILBERT YOUTH FOOTBALL LEAGUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charity Air Ambulance funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charity Air Ambulance. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charity Air Ambulance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph