Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Missouri · Charitable trust

Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family Trust

The charitable trust provides charitable grants to indigent missouri residents with disabilities.

$328k
Granted FY2021
6
Itemized grants FY2021
6
Organizations funded FY2021
100%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2021
$120k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2021
$24,000
Largest grant, FY2021
$41,800
Organizations funded a year
2 to 6
FY2020 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
1
Total assets, FY2021
$5.2M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 100% of the organizations Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20216$120k100%
FY20202$24kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Health$97kPublic Safety & Disaster$24kRecreation & Sports$17kHuman Services$6k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2021, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Tree House of Greater St Louis$41,80016%
Equine-Assisted Therapy Inc$24,00015%
Cedar Creek Therapeutic Riding Center$24,00016%
Wonderland Camp Foundation$17,00011%
Special Olympics Missouri Inc$12,50010%
Nami of Missouri$11,25313%
Showme Aquatics and Fitness$7,20011%
Exceptional Equestrians of the Missouri Valley Inc$6,00012%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTree House of Greater St Louis: $41,800 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetEquine-Assisted Therapy Inc: $24,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCedar Creek Therapeutic Riding Center: $24,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetWonderland Camp Foundation: $17,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSpecial Olympics Missouri Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNami of Missouri: $11,253 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetShowme Aquatics and Fitness: $7,200 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetExceptional Equestrians of the Missouri Valley Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family Trust with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family Trust?

Find your warmest path to Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family Trust

How much does Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family Trust give?
Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family Trust reported 6 itemized grants totaling $120,000, out of $328,458 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 6 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2021.
What does Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2021, its largest causes are Health (67%), Public Safety & Disaster (17%), Recreation & Sports (12%).
Who are Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2021: Tree House of Greater St Louis ($42k), Equine-Assisted Therapy Inc ($24k), Cedar Creek Therapeutic Riding Center ($24k).
Does Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family Trust based?
Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family Trust is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $243k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home