Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chapman Hanson Fndn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$115k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$1.7MArts & Culture$820kHuman Services$624kHealth$430kRecreation & Sports$426kEducation$280kPublic Safety & Disaster$257kScience & Tech$210kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $171k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $966k
$85,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE$115,000
GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK$115,000
MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION$115,000
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$113,541
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY$110,000
ALSAC- ST JUDES CHILDRENS$100,000
NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL CENTER$85,000
Individual grant recipient$85,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$75,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES$52,416
ACE SCHOLARSHIPS$45,000
CITY OF HOPE$45,000
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION$40,000
CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY$23,708
HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY &$17,416
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $756k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $42k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $32k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $24k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $19k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $15k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $10k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $75k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $70k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $60k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $60k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $52k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $40k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $75k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $48k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $45k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $39k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $29k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
WY
PA
CA
CO
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 17 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
0

Total granted

$5.2M
$0

Still filing today

65%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentRecreation & SportsEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NP
    NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $642k · revenue +95%
  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $610k · revenue +112%
  • MW
    MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $415k · revenue +66%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    American Gas Association

    American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

    —
    2
    National Association of Clean Water Agencies

    Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

    —
    3
    National Public Radio Inc

    National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

    Arts & Culture
    4
    Npr Foundation

    The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

    —
    5
    Eastern National

    Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

    Recreation & Sports
    6
    New York Botanical Garden

    The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

    Environment
    7
    American Water Works Association

    To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

    Public Benefit
    8
    Rainforest Trust

    Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

    International
    9
    National Tropical Botanical Garden

    To enrich life by perpetuating tropical plants, ecosystems and cultural heritage through discovery, scientific research, conservation, and education.

    Environment
    10
    American Geophysical Union

    Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

    Science & Tech
    11
    United States Naval Institute

    Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

    —
    12
    American Foreign Service Association

    American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Children's Aid Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    11/11
    Grantees still filing
    9/11
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $642,162 · OtherNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATIONALSAC- ST JUDES CHILDRENS: $430,000 · OtherALSAC- ST JUDES CHILDRENSGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK: $425,532 · OtherGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARKIndividual grant recipient: $329,212 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $210,000 · OtherSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONCITY OF HOPE: $209,668 · OtherCITY OF HOPEHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY &: $109,865 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC: $460,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE HI…NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER: $360,080 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CONSTITU…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $357,416 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITI…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $256,741 · Human ServicesAmerican Nationa…THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $141,872 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S A…ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY: $610,000 · Recreation & SportsROCKY MOUNTAI…MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION: $415,000 · EnvironmentMONTANA WI…SANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN: $57,700 · EnvironmentSANTA BARB…ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $170,540 · EducationOPERATION GRATITUDE INC: $35,000 · Public Benefit
    Other$2,356,439Arts & Culture$820,080Human Services$756,029Recreation & Sports$610,000Environment$472,700Education$170,540Public Benefit$35,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $642,162 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY: $610,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC: $460,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION: $415,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER: $360,080 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $357,416 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $256,741 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $170,540 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $141,872 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN: $57,700 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOPERATION GRATITUDE INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY ↗
    • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC ↗
    • Who funds MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION ↗
    • Who funds NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER ↗
    • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
    • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
    • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
    • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
    • Who funds SANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN ↗
    • Who funds OPERATION GRATITUDE INC ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Chapman Hanson Fndn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chapman Hanson Fndn. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Chapman Hanson Fndn’s filings →

      More from the funding graph