Skip to content

· Public charity

Chapin Hall Center for Children Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago

Chapin hall's mission is to improve the well-being of children and youth, families, and their communities through broad-perspective policy research.

$61k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Education$320kSocial Science$220kScience & Tech$80kYouth Development$80k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $60,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $61,489 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,489 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$58M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOARD OF REGENTS NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION$20,000
RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY$20,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Trustees of Boston University: $60k → 16%The Regents of the Univ of California: $60k → 14%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $60k → 12%THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $60k → 17%GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $60k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $40k → 14%RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY: $60k → 8%BOARD OF REGENTS NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION: $60k → 10%Trustees of Boston University: $20k → 16%The Regents of the Univ of California: $20k → 14%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $20k → 12%THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $20k → 17%GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $20k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $20k → 14%RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY: $20k → 8%BOARD OF REGENTS NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION: $20k → 10%California State University: $60k → 14%California State University: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
NV
NJ
CA
SC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$700k · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$700k
$0

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GT
    GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $80k · revenue +47%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2020 · $80k · revenue +32%
  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES AUXILIARY SERVICES INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $80k · revenue +4%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    3/3
    Grantees still filing
    3/3
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    BOARD OF REGENTS NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION: $80,000 · OtherBOARD OF REGENTS NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATIONCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $80,000 · OtherCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTONBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $80,000 · OtherBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMATRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · OtherRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITYREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $80,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIATHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $60,000 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $80,000 · HealthGEORGIA TECH…CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES AUXILIARY SERVICES INC: $80,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA S…
    Other$540,000Health$80,000Education$80,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES AUXILIARY SERVICES INC: $80,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
    • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES AUXILIARY SERVICES INC ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Chapin Hall Center for Children Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chapin Hall Center for Children Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
    • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chapin Hall Center for Children Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago’s filings →

    More from the funding graph