Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Chan Zuckerberg Biohub Inc

Accelerating science through its mission to cure, prevent or manage all diseases by the end of the 21st century.

$40M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$12M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$148MHealth$54MRecreation & Sports$3.8M
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $417k
  • $250k+8 grants · $40M
$2,868,865
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$12,257,389
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$11,626,018
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY$5,535,784
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$2,973,388
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$2,868,865
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$2,826,739
THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$1,442,193
YALE UNIVERSITY$434,943
THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY$217,471
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION$200,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 45% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $11.6M → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $11.5M → 8%UC BERKELEY: $6.0M → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $12.3M → 10%THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $1.4M → 17%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $2.8M → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $3.0M → 19%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $11.2M → 8%UC BERKELEY: $5.8M → 10%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $167k → 17%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $972k → 14%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $667k → 19%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $11.1M → 8%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY: $5.5M → 10%THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $217k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $2.9M → 14%STANFORD: $9.5M → 8%UC BERKELEY: $4.9M → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $472k → 14%STANFORD: $9.1M → 8%UC BERKELEY: $4.7M → 10%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $8.4M → 8%UC BERKELEY: $4.6M → 10%STANFORD: $6.7M → 8%UC BERKELEY: $4.1M → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $200k → 10%UC BERKELEY: $2.9M → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$121M · 4 repeat orgs$4.1M to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
1

Total granted

$121M
$667k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $76M
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $39M
  • Northwestern University
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2023 · $667k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
7
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
12
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwestern University and the most unlike its peers is University of California Berkeley Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $75,619,854 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY — $38,553,448 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY+1 more — $666,841 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $79,104,810 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUN…University of Chicago — $3,340,604 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $2,973,388 · Education+4 more — $2,461,274 · EducationNorthwestern University — $3,798,478 · Recreation & Sports
Other$114,840,143Education$87,880,076Recreation & Sports$3,798,478

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $79,104,810 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNorthwestern University — $3,798,478 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $3,340,604 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $2,973,388 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $1,608,860 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYale University — $434,943 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $217,471 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Chan Zuckerberg Biohub Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Yale University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph