· Private foundation
Chaim V'Shulem Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k93 grants · $110k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $197k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $237k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONGREGATION AHAVAS YISROEL | $95,351 |
| CONG KEHAL ADAS NASAUD | $91,459 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,250 |
| YESHIVA MACHZIKEI HADAS | $38,270 |
| CONG BOROV | $25,000 |
| KIPAS HADAYUNIM OF ROCKLAND COUNTY | $23,660 |
| BAIS YEHUDA | $19,140 |
| KEREN LEAH | $18,000 |
| KOLEL AVREICHIM DCHASIDI BELZ | $11,036 |
| MACHON MASEH ROKEACH INC | $11,000 |
| HATZOLOH EMS MONSEY NY | $10,400 |
| CONG KEHILAS BELZ MONSEY | $10,000 |
| MERKAZ HATZEDAKA CORP | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| BELZ INSTITUTIONS IN ISRAEL | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
24 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 86 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $172k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CACONG AHAVAS YISROEL INC2× · 2017–2018 · $321k
- CKCONG KEHAL ADAS NASAUD2× · 2021–2022 · $99k
- CACONGREGATION AHAVAS YISROEL2× · 2021–2022 · $98k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $61k
- CMCONG MACHZIKEI HADAS OF BELZone grant, 2017 · $35k
- CSCONG SDEI YAAKOV DSHIKON SQUAREone grant, 2021 · $15k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.
Providing support for families in need of food for the sabbath and holidays
Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations
To help the indigent and other charitable institutions.
To provide financial assistance to religious and charitable organizations worldwide to help them continue their activities.
The furthurance of jewish concepts and religious beliefs.
To provide medical support to families in need
How this is measured
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 148 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Mkz Charity Foundation Inc · The Foundation for Hope · The Gds Foundation · Greenzweig Family Foundation · Zichron Simcha Dsassov · Donors Fund Inc · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · The Jmg Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Chaim V'Shulem Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chaim V'Shulem Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Bnos Bracha Inc: 9% of income from government
- Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Chaim V'Shulem’s filings →