Skip to content

· Public charity

Chadtough Defeat Dipg Foundation

In the fight for a dipg/dmg cure, the foundation helps patients and families by funding game-changing research and providing navigation throughout their journey.

$7.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$676k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$15MScience & Tech$3.7MEducation$617kFood & Nutrition$121k
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 21 grants below total $4,965,825, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,414,958 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,449,133 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $182k
  • $250k+11 grants · $4.7M
$256,603
Median grant
12
States reached
$8.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$675,819
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$581,613
MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA$577,435
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA$577,273
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$389,051
BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF$385,754
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$344,664
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC$311,685
LEELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$296,456
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO$289,805
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$256,603
MD ANDERSON CANCER$122,522
BUY A BRICK FOUNDATION$59,792
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$32,198
LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$16,730
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA: $577k → 11%BROAD INSTITUTE: $271k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $176k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $125k → 11%THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $175k → 22%LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $335k → 8%BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF: $386k → 14%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $582k → 17%METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITU: $367k → 16%CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $126k → 14%ST JUDE: $125k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $1.6M → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $389k → 11%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $125k → 11%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $128k → 12%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $193k → 12%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $135k → 19%CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $200k → 16%SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $676k → 9%THE JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $125k → 19%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $288k → 17%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $325k → 16%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $1.3M → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $234k → 11%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $125k → 11%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLO: $383k → 8%MD ANDERSON CANCER: $289k → 16%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $736k → 14%SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $255k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO: $290k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $589k → 14%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $383k → 11%PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COL: $151k → 8%WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE: $200k → 17%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $525k → 14%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $495k → 14%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $602k → 16%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $436k → 14%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $386k → 16%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $328k → 8%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $436k → 14%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $312k → 16%LEELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $296k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $345k → 14%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $175k → 16%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $200k → 17%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $155k → 16%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $147k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $2.4M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Australia$1.4M · 55% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH GRANT

North America (Canada and Mexico)$562k · 23% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH GRANT

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$528k · 22% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH GRANT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 35 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
7

Total granted

$20M
$684k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+26%

Still filing today

71%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +162%
  • SC
    SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $931k · revenue +16%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $680k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2024 · $176k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
    one grant, 2021 · $125k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $121k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
8
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
9
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
10
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
11
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the brown university health system, rih is committed to its mission: delivering health with care.

Health
12
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Buy a Brick Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
29/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $6,507,145 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $2,251,323 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $577,273 · OtherUTMD ANDERSON: $411,947 · Other+15 more: $2,540,433 · Other+15 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,974,384 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute In…SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $930,877 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALWEILL CORNELL IMAGING AT NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN: $600,000 · HealthWEILL CORNELL IMAGING AT NEWYOR…MAYO CLINIC: $577,435 · HealthMAYO CLINICLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $493,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR C…CITY OF HOPE: $385,754 · HealthCITY OF HOPEThe Broad Institute Inc: $277,996 · HealthCHILDREN'S NATIONAL: $260,900 · Health+9 more: $1,387,268 · Health+9 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $914,979 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES O…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $906,763 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBI…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $680,356 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $622,941 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYBaylor College of Medicine: $473,955 · EducationBaylor College of Medic…Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $388,460 · EducationMassachusetts Institute…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $275,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSIT…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $212,240 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $187,500 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $185,226 · Education+2 more: $275,510 · Education+2 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyNorthwestern University: $74,091 · Recreation & SportsBuy A Brick Foundation Inc: $59,792 · International
Other$12,288,121Health$6,887,614Education$5,122,930Philanthropy$100,000Recreation & Sports$74,091International$59,792

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,974,384 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $930,877 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $914,979 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $906,763 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $680,356 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $622,941 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEILL CORNELL IMAGING AT NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN: $600,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $493,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $473,955 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $388,460 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF HOPE: $385,754 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc: $277,996 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $275,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL: $260,900 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $224,516 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $212,683 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $212,240 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $189,320 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $187,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $185,226 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $185,226 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CURE STARTS NOW INC: $155,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $150,510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $144,215 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNorthwestern University: $74,091 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUCILE SALTER PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD: $46,308 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARMS WIDE OPEN CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chadtough Defeat Dipg Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chadtough Defeat Dipg Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Chadtough Defeat Dipg Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Chadtough Defeat Dipg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chadtough Defeat Dipg’s filings →

More from the funding graph