Skip to content
Ceo New York Jobs Council Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Ceo New York Jobs Council Inc

The ceo new york jobs council, inc.

$675k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$2.7MEmployment$1.6MScience & Tech$835kPhilanthropy$50k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $645,995, the rows itemized in this filing. The $674,889 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $28,894 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $176k
  • $250k+1 grant · $350k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAREERWISE NEW YORK INC$350,000
KINGSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE$105,227
PROJECT BASTA$70,600
YEAR UP$40,000
JOHN PATRICK UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH AND APPLIED SCIENCES$35,999
RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR CITY UNIVERSITY OF NY$27,965
QUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE$16,204
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YEAR UP: $50k → 16%QUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $16k → 13%CAREERWISE NEW YORK INC: $350k → 17%KINGSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $105k → 20%JOHN PATRICK UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH AND APPLIED SCIENCES: $36k → 13%YEAR UP: $40k → 16%CAREERWISE NEW YORK INC: $350k → 17%PROJECT BASTA: $71k → 17%PROJECT BASTA: $63k → 17%RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR CITY UNIVERSITY OF NY: $28k → 17%RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF CUNY: $2.2M → 17%RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK: $799k → 17%RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF CUNY: $335k → 17%COOP CAREERS: $50k → 17%PENCIL: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 4 repeat orgs$257k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$4.9M
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+76%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $157k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    Research Foundation of the City University of New York
    4× · 2020–2024 · $3.4M · revenue +22%
  • CN
    CAREERWISE NEW YORK INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +42%
  • A
    ARIZOU
    2× · 2023–2024 · $133k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • PI
    PENCIL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -25%
  • CC
    COOP Careers Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
2
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
3
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
4
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
College Summit Inc

College summit, inc. d/b/a peerforward (peerforward)'s mission is to unleash the power of positive peer influence to transform the lives of youth living in low-income communities by connecting them to college and careers. in low-income…

Education
7
Open New York Education Inc

Open new york education, inc. supports public education, awareness, and engagement around housing issues to help build a movement for a more abundant and inclusive new york.

Housing & Shelter
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
10
City Year Inc

City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…

Unclassified
11
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
12
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Careerwise New York Inc; the most unlike its peers is Queensborough Community College Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Research Foundation of the City University of New York: $3,399,733 · EducationResearch Foundation of the City University of New YorkCAREERWISE NEW YORK INC: $1,300,000 · EducationCAREERWISE NEW YORK INC+5 more: $394,531 · Education+5 morePENCIL INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyJOHN PATRICK UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH AND APPLIED SCIENCES: $35,999 · Other
Education$5,094,264Philanthropy$50,000Other$35,999

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $3,399,733 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCAREERWISE NEW YORK INC: $1,300,000 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetARIZOU: $133,100 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetKINGSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE ASSOCIATION INC: $105,227 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $90,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENCIL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCOOP Careers Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetQUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FUND INC: $16,204 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …
National Philanthropic TrustPA10.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ceo New York Jobs Council Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ceo New York Jobs Council Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ceo New York Jobs Council’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home