Skip to content
Century 21 Associates Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Century 21 Associates Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
192
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$334k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0148% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$3.8MHealth$947kInternational$687kPhilanthropy$443kHuman Services$209kCivil Rights$85kYouth Development$75kEducation$67kOther$0
02FY2025 · 192 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k170 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $233k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $717k
  • $250k+1 grant · $334k
$180
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVAT MAGEN ABRAHAM$334,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$125,000
THE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER$100,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL OHR$100,000
RECORDED TALMUD$65,000
SYNAGOGUE OF DEAL$62,500
CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$60,503
HILLEL YESHIVA$52,000
HAHAIM YESHIVAT SHALOM INC$52,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
SEPHARDIC ADDICTION FAMILY EDUCATION$50,000
YESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH$42,500
SHUVI NAFSHI FOUNDATION INC$36,000
BARKAI YESHIVAH$26,000
AHAVAT SHALOM$26,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $126k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FORESEEABLE FUTURE FOUNDATION: $8k → 4%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $26k → 20%KEREN ANIYEM: $250 → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $28k → 17%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $26k → 17%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $26k → 17%LEOVDE HASHEM INC: $453 → 20%ACHDUS FOUNDATION: $500 → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $7k → 17%BETH OLOTH: $1k → 17%BETH OLOTH: $1k → 17%BETH OLOTH: $1k → 17%ACHDUS FOUNDATION: $701 → 17%ACHDUS FOUNDATION: $301 → 17%ACHDUS FOUNDATION: $251 → 17%MAREH KEREN TORAH: $52 → 17%KETER SHLOMO FOUNDATION: $52 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
PA
NJ
AR
TN
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.5M · 263 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

263 repeat relationships: 138 still active in FY2025, 125 since wound down; 54 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

263
423

Total granted

$6.5M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+18%

Still filing today

10%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $152k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyReligionHuman ServicesEducationInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +904%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $425k · revenue +5%
  • TR
    THE RECORDED TALMUD
    4× · 2021–2024 · $168k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THEISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE NY TRISTAACC
    one grant, 2022 · $450k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $166k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $84k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
5
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
6
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
7
Or Yechiel

Award grants to promote torah study

Religion
8
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
9
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
10
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
11
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
12
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tehilot Israel Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lung Cancer Research Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 741 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
71/76
Grantees still filing
47/76
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $835,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF THEISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE NY TRISTAACC: $450,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THEISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE NY TRISTAACCTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $405,625 · OtherTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTERSYNAGOGUE OF DEAL: $283,816 · OtherHILLEL YESHIVA: $237,301 · Other+170 more: $3,233,015 · Other+170 moreMAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA: $1,000,333 · ReligionMAGEN ABRAHAM Y…Shuvi Nafshi Foundation INC: $99,000 · ReligionShuvi Nafshi Fo…+6 more: $49,416 · ReligionUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $425,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $50,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $455 · PhilanthropyAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $300,000 · Youth DevelopmentSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $76,610 · Youth DevelopmentHAHAIM YESHIVAT SHALOM INC: $182,000 · EducationBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $116,298 · EducationHASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATED: $35,000 · EducationREACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER: $22,500 · Education+1 more: $1,303 · EducationNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $150,000 · HealthNew York Cancer Center Inc: $100,000 · HealthLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,800 · Health+1 more: $705 · HealthCentral Fund of Israel: $136,160 · International+2 more: $5,156 · International
Other$5,444,757Religion$1,148,749Philanthropy$475,455Youth Development$376,610Education$357,101Health$261,505International$141,316

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $425,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $300,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetHAHAIM YESHIVAT SHALOM INC: $182,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetTHE RECORDED TALMUD: $167,583 over 4y, 12% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $136,160 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $116,298 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $112,722 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNew York Cancer Center Inc: $100,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetShuvi Nafshi Foundation INC: $99,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $76,610 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATED: $35,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetREACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER: $22,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMAGEN DAVID OF MANHATTAN: $17,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetKEREN YOM TOV INC: $13,416 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $13,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFORESEEABLE FUTURE FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $4,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBETH OLOTH: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSEPHARDIC BROOKLYN COMMUNITY ERUB LTD: $2,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetGESHER YEHUDA INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACHDUS FOUNDATION INC: $1,753 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMATTEH MOSHE INC: $1,303 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD LIFE SOCIETY INC: $705 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTORAH VEHORAAH FOUNDATION INC: $656 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASKEEL EL DAL SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHADRAT DAVID INC: $455 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Migdal OHR ↗
  • Who funds HAHAIM YESHIVAT SHALOM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RECORDED TALMUD ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds BARKAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds New York Cancer Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Shuvi Nafshi Foundation INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chehebar Family Found…Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Foop FoundationThe Jimmy and Berta K…The Setton FoundationThe Adjmi-Dwek Founda…The Amin and Lillian …Ralph J Harary Founda…Marbeh Shalom Foundat…Jewish Communal FundIsaac & Marjorie Gind…The Maj Franco Family…
Chehebar Family FoundationNY147.3× affinity71 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chehebar Family Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Foop Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Setton Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · The Maj Franco Family Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Century 21 Associates Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Century 21 Associates Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Century 21 Associates Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Century 21 Associates Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 741 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Century 21 Associates’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home