Skip to content

· Public charity

Central Valley Medical Center

The mission of Central Valley Medical Center is to provide sensitive, compassionate health care of the highest quality to our patients, their families, and friends.

$263k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.1MRecreation & Sports$903kEducation$541kYouth Development$29k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $232,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $263,278 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $31,278 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $170k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$125M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LDS Philanthropies$120,000
Friends of CJC$50,000
Snow College$25,000
Utah State University$25,000
Juab High School$6,500
Juab Junior Livestock$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Leamington Town: $15k → 14%Juab High School: $506k → 8%Corp of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints: $1.0M → 8%LDS Philanthropies: $120k → 8%Utah State University: $50k → 12%Snow College: $250k → 15%Juab School District: $102k → 8%Brigham Young University: $50k → 8%Utah State University: $25k → 12%Snow College: $100k → 15%Friends of CJC: $50k → 8%Brigham Young University: $40k → 8%Snow College: $35k → 15%Juab High School: $11k → 8%Brigham Young University: $25k → 8%Snow College: $30k → 15%Juab High School: $11k → 8%Snow College: $25k → 15%Nephi City - Canyon Hills Golf Course: $10k → 8%Snow College: $25k → 15%Juab High School: $8k → 8%Juab Junior Livestock: $7k → 8%Juab High School: $7k → 8%Juab Junior Livestock: $6k → 8%Juab Junior Livestock: $6k → 8%Juab Junior Livestock: $6k → 8%Juab Junior Livestock: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 5 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$1.4M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
0%

Still filing today

20%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JUAB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    6× · 2019–2025 · $644k
  • SC
    SNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $465k · revenue +41%
  • BY
    BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2025 · $195k

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M
  • BY
    Brigham Young University Alumni LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue 0%
  • LT
    Leamington Town
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $1,000,000 · OtherCHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSJUAB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $644,238 · OtherJUAB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $195,000 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITYUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $75,000 · Other+4 more: $104,400 · OtherSNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $465,000 · EducationSNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATIO…Brigham Young University Alumni LLC: $40,000 · EducationBrigham Young Universi…
Other$2,018,638Education$505,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $465,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetBrigham Young University Alumni LLC: $40,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Brigham Young University Alumni LLC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Central Valley Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Central Valley Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Central Valley Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph