Skip to content
Central District Management Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Central District Management Association

Restore viability of central avenue business district

$297k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$142kFood & Nutrition$128kYouth Development$57kHuman Services$40kHealth$33kCommunity Improvement$31kEmployment$27kAnimals$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $195,430, the rows itemized in this filing. The $297,271 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $101,841 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $163k
$13,635
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIRCH & BEE WOODWORKING$15,000
POWER BEAUTY UNLIMITED LLC$14,997
BEIGNET BELLIES$14,802
BULL AND BEE MEADERY$14,646
LOYAL MINDSET$14,602
AMIGOS CORNER CAFE$14,441
THE BALLOONARY$13,719
CAPITAL DISTRICT INTERVENTIONAL SPINE AND REHABILITATION PLLC$13,635
CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT$13,389
TRAINED 2 GO SERVICES LLC$11,813
URBAN AFTERMATH BOOKS INC$10,900
ECO ONYX$10,855
STATE FARM$8,980
KENMORE BALLROOM$8,160
POTO TRANSPORT$7,906
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LOYAL MINDSET: $15k → 14%LARK STREET PHOTO: $8k → 14%EASTON BOOKS: $3k → 14%POWER BEAUTY UNLIMITED LLC: $15k → 14%FRESH & FLY: $15k → 14%FORT ORANGE STORE: $15k → 14%PEARL ST DINER: $15k → 14%BEIGNET BELLIES: $15k → 14%MAURICE'S DELI: $15k → 14%BULL AND BEE MEADERY: $15k → 14%YOUNG FUTURES: $13k → 14%ECO ONYX: $11k → 14%NANI'S ICED TEA: $10k → 14%KENMORE BALLROOM: $8k → 14%KENMORE BALLROOM: $7k → 14%STUDIO23: $6k → 14%STUDIO 109: $5k → 14%KEOBI LLC: $15k → 14%BIRCH & BEE WOODWORKING: $15k → 14%KEMA KREATIONS: $15k → 14%MOXIE OWL DBA THE YARD: $15k → 14%THE BALLOONARY: $14k → 14%URBAN AFTERMATH BOOKS INC: $11k → 14%YAMAGUCHIE: $14k → 14%ALIBABA HALAL MEAT BAZAAR: $4k → 14%ALL PLUS TABLE TENNIS LLC: $13k → 14%PELAGIE HAIR BRAIDING: $2k → 14%MAJESTIC RECORDS: $15k → 14%HAIR STUDIO 205: $15k → 14%ALLIE B'S: $15k → 14%CELEBRITIES BARBER SHOP: $15k → 14%PAULY'S HOTEL: $15k → 14%GOODBEE ELECTRONICS: $14k → 14%AMIGOS CORNER CAFE: $14k → 14%CENTRAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT: $13k → 14%FAITH CREATIVE NAMES: $9k → 14%STATE FARM: $9k → 14%HEAVEN ON EARTH BEAUTY SALON: $2k → 14%FAITH CREATIVE NAMES: $2k → 14%FLO'S AFRICAN HAIR BRAIDING: $2k → 14%CAPITAL DISTRICT INTERVENTIONAL SPINE AND REHABILITATION PLLC: $14k → 14%CAPITAL FOOD TRUCK: $15k → 14%TRAINED 2 GO SERVICES LLC: $12k → 14%RESTAURANT DEPOT: $2k → 14%POTO TRANSPORT: $8k → 14%NORTHEAST ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $2k → 14%POTO TRANSPORT: $5k → 14%AM & J DIGITAL INC: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

8%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40k · 3 repeat orgs$479k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
34

Total granted

$40k
$300k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $179k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WL
    WGM74 LLC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k
  • PT
    POTO TRANSPORT
    2× · 2023–2024 · $13k
  • FC
    FAITH CREATIVE NAMES INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $11k

Funded once

  • FF
    FRESH & FLY
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • KL
    KEOBI LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • AB
    ALLIE B'S
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/2
Grantees still filing
0/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+50 more: $505,500 · Other+50 moreCENTRAL DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION: $13,389 · Community Improvement
Other$505,500Community Improvement$13,389

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRAL DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION: $13,389 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNORTHEAST ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 13% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRAL DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Capitalize Albany Cor…
Capitalize Albany CorporationNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Capitalize Albany Corporation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Central District Management Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Central District Management Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Central District Management Association?

    Find your warmest path to Central District Management Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Central District Management Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home