Skip to content

· Public charity

Central America Poultry Export Quota Inc

Activities that promote and support the common business interests of the u.s.

$4.1M
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$816k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Food & Nutrition$8.9M
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $816,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,066,557 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,250,557 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$816,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL$816,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%USA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $2.4M → 14%USA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $1.7M → 14%USA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $1.4M → 14%USA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $1.3M → 14%USA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $1.2M → 14%USA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $816k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $3.3M on the FY2023 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$3.3M · 100% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: ANNUAL NATIONAL SURVEILLANCE AND FOOD SAFETY COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN ANAPA AND IPSA, THE NICARAGUAN SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY AGENCY. DIAGNOSIS OF THE NICARAGUAN AVIAN HEALTH STATUS AND POULTRY PROCESSING PLANTS FOR EXPORTING CHICKEN MEAT TO THE UNITED STATES. PARTICIPATION IN REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL POULTRY ASSOCIATION FORUMS, TECHNICAL REGIONAL MEETINGS, TRAINING EVENTS ON POULTRY HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY, AND MEETINGS, TO FOLLOW UP WITH THE AGENDA OF THE DR-CAFTA AGRICULTURE REVIEW COMMISSION. FACILITATION OF TECHNICAL AND LEGAL MATTERS RELATED TO POULTRY REGULATORY AFFAIRS. $27,500SUPPORT FOR: I) 2022 COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN ANAPA AND IPSA; II) ANAPAS ACTIVITIES AND PARTICIPATION IN FOLLOW-UP MEETINGS RELATED TO THE DR-CAFTA AGRICULTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION, AND III) FACILITATION OF TECHNICAL REGULATIONS AND LEGAL MATTERS FOR POULTRY RELATED ISSUES. $54,500FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR ENHANCING CAPACITIES AND CARRYING OUT TECHNICAL, LEGAL AND TRADE AGENDA $60,000 · 1)"STRENGTHENING THE MARKETING AND COMMUNICATION STRATEGY TO INCREASE POULTRY PRODUCTS CONSUMPTION; AND TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL COOPERATION TO IMPROVE THE NATIONAL POULTRY HEALTH SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM IN A COORDINATED EFFORT WITH THE MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK (MAG)." - $182,633 CONTINUED INSTITUTIONAL MARKETING AND COMMUNICATION STRATEGY UNDER THE SLOGANS "CHICKEN AND EGG: A THOUSAND WAYS TO SAY I LOVE YOU AND "WE LIKE YOU HEALTHY" USING RADIO, EVENTS, MAGAZINES, BILLBOARDS, AND SOCIAL MEDIA. 2) "PROJECT TO STRENGTHEN THE NATIONAL POULTRY HEALTH SURVEILLANCE PLAN AND SUPPORT PROGRAM" - $400,000. CONTINUED STRENGTHENING OF THE NATIONAL POULTRY HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY PROGRAM, IN COLLABORATION WITH MAG, BY PROVIDING DIAGNOSTIC TESTING AND SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES, TRAINING FOR TECHNICAL PERSONNEL IN ASSOCIATED AREAS, AND BY PROVIDING TECHNICAL PERSONNEL, ANTIGENS AND SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT AND CALIBRATION SERVICES. · IMPROVEMENT OF TECHNICAL FACILITIES FOR "LEARNING BY DOING" PROGRAM, TEACHING AND RESEARCH: CONSTRUCTION OF A TUNNEL POULTRY HOUSE FOR BROILER CHICKENS,A TUNNEL POULTRY HOUSE FOR BREEDERS, AND A HATCHERY; CONSTRUCTION OF A BROMATOLOGY LABORATORY, AND PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT TO DETERMINE POULTRY INTESTINAL HEALTH/ POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION. CONTRIBUTION TO ENDOWED SCHOLARSHIP FUND, AT ZAMORANO AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY IN HONDURAS, TO OFFER SCHOLARSHIP OPPORTUNITIES TO SENIOR STUDENTS INTERESTED IN POULTRY SCIENCE, THAT WOULD ALSO BENEFIT WITH THEIR TECHNICAL EXPERTISE TO THE POULTRY INDUSTRIES OF EL SALVADOR, GUATEMALA, HONDURAS, NICARAGUA, AND THE UNITED STATES.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUSA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $8,862,912 over 6y, 14% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds USA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Central America Poultry Export Quota Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Central America Poultry Export Quota Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Central America Poultry Export Quota Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Central America Poultry Export Quota Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Central America Poultry Export Quota’s filings →

    More from the funding graph