· Public charity
Central America Poultry Export Quota Inc
Activities that promote and support the common business interests of the u.s.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $816,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,066,557 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,250,557 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| USA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL | $816,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $3.3M on the FY2023 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: ANNUAL NATIONAL SURVEILLANCE AND FOOD SAFETY COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN ANAPA AND IPSA, THE NICARAGUAN SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY AGENCY. DIAGNOSIS OF THE NICARAGUAN AVIAN HEALTH STATUS AND POULTRY PROCESSING PLANTS FOR EXPORTING CHICKEN MEAT TO THE UNITED STATES. PARTICIPATION IN REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL POULTRY ASSOCIATION FORUMS, TECHNICAL REGIONAL MEETINGS, TRAINING EVENTS ON POULTRY HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY, AND MEETINGS, TO FOLLOW UP WITH THE AGENDA OF THE DR-CAFTA AGRICULTURE REVIEW COMMISSION. FACILITATION OF TECHNICAL AND LEGAL MATTERS RELATED TO POULTRY REGULATORY AFFAIRS. $27,500SUPPORT FOR: I) 2022 COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN ANAPA AND IPSA; II) ANAPAS ACTIVITIES AND PARTICIPATION IN FOLLOW-UP MEETINGS RELATED TO THE DR-CAFTA AGRICULTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION, AND III) FACILITATION OF TECHNICAL REGULATIONS AND LEGAL MATTERS FOR POULTRY RELATED ISSUES. $54,500FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR ENHANCING CAPACITIES AND CARRYING OUT TECHNICAL, LEGAL AND TRADE AGENDA $60,000 · 1)"STRENGTHENING THE MARKETING AND COMMUNICATION STRATEGY TO INCREASE POULTRY PRODUCTS CONSUMPTION; AND TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL COOPERATION TO IMPROVE THE NATIONAL POULTRY HEALTH SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM IN A COORDINATED EFFORT WITH THE MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK (MAG)." - $182,633 CONTINUED INSTITUTIONAL MARKETING AND COMMUNICATION STRATEGY UNDER THE SLOGANS "CHICKEN AND EGG: A THOUSAND WAYS TO SAY I LOVE YOU AND "WE LIKE YOU HEALTHY" USING RADIO, EVENTS, MAGAZINES, BILLBOARDS, AND SOCIAL MEDIA. 2) "PROJECT TO STRENGTHEN THE NATIONAL POULTRY HEALTH SURVEILLANCE PLAN AND SUPPORT PROGRAM" - $400,000. CONTINUED STRENGTHENING OF THE NATIONAL POULTRY HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY PROGRAM, IN COLLABORATION WITH MAG, BY PROVIDING DIAGNOSTIC TESTING AND SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES, TRAINING FOR TECHNICAL PERSONNEL IN ASSOCIATED AREAS, AND BY PROVIDING TECHNICAL PERSONNEL, ANTIGENS AND SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT AND CALIBRATION SERVICES. · IMPROVEMENT OF TECHNICAL FACILITIES FOR "LEARNING BY DOING" PROGRAM, TEACHING AND RESEARCH: CONSTRUCTION OF A TUNNEL POULTRY HOUSE FOR BROILER CHICKENS,A TUNNEL POULTRY HOUSE FOR BREEDERS, AND A HATCHERY; CONSTRUCTION OF A BROMATOLOGY LABORATORY, AND PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT TO DETERMINE POULTRY INTESTINAL HEALTH/ POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION. CONTRIBUTION TO ENDOWED SCHOLARSHIP FUND, AT ZAMORANO AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY IN HONDURAS, TO OFFER SCHOLARSHIP OPPORTUNITIES TO SENIOR STUDENTS INTERESTED IN POULTRY SCIENCE, THAT WOULD ALSO BENEFIT WITH THEIR TECHNICAL EXPERTISE TO THE POULTRY INDUSTRIES OF EL SALVADOR, GUATEMALA, HONDURAS, NICARAGUA, AND THE UNITED STATES.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Central America Poultry Export Quota Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Central America Poultry Export Quota Inc?
Find your warmest path to Central America Poultry Export Quota Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.