Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Center for Civic Innovation Inc

The Center for Civic Innovation uses local data and research to strengthen civic engagement and scale community-driven solutions in order to ensure that local public policy reflects the needs and the voices of people in Atlanta.

$45k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182023.

Employment$583kCommunity Improvement$225kPublic Benefit$100kCivil Rights$40kYouth Development$17kReligion$17kHuman Services$12kCrime & Legal$6k
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$865k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cure Violence Atlanta Inc$6,000
Hopeful Change Project Inc$6,000
Girrosol Wellness Inc$5,500
Corner of Hope at Lakewood$5,500
Wii Care Atlanta$5,500
Tyme to Thrive beyond Grief$5,500
Mothers Against Gang Violence$5,500
Freedom is a Choice Inc$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Cure Violence Atlanta Inc: $6k → 13%Girrosol Wellness Inc: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Kilimanjaro

Promote health and wellness globally for women and kids

Health
2
Urban Youth Ministry of Greater Indianapolis Inc

Youth

3
Rewire Community

Rewire Community is a grassroots organization dedicated to creating awareness, dialog and action to help prevent and break cycles of gender-based violence (GBV), especially intimate partner violence. Along with providing financial support…

Human Services
4
BlackPush Inc

Our organization combats gun violence works to turn out the vote pushes for laws to help previously incarcerated and issues related to social injustice.

Religion
5
J-Jireh Services

promote and open community resources

Religion
6
Grow Home Inc

Assist community members in capacity building, program development, fiscal sponsorship and organizational development for the general improvement in quality of life plus green space and community organiz.

Arts & Culture
7
Love Activists

Provide educational services to underserved youth encouraging health sustainability respect social justice and love through fun and engaging instructional videos as well as short lessons and music-based learning tools for the classroom

Education
8
United Women of the Horn

United Women of the Horn (UWH) exists to advance the leadership, safety, and civic participation of Black immigrant women, with a focus on East African communities. The organization delivers trauma-informed, culturally grounded programs…

Civil Rights
9
Endangered Kind Inc

Endangered Kind mission is to reduce gun violence using a community-driven approach that fosters trust to reach, restore, and sustain quality of life for high-risk youth and young adults ages 15-27 in the City of Philadelphia.

Human Services
10
Hope Whispers Community Organization Inc

Combat community deterioration

Community Improvement
11
Safe Space Organization

Safe Space Organization is a community safe space that strives to change the conversation around mental health by educating, connecting and supporting others through a peer-to-peer network. Safe Space is a community hub with therapeutic…

Health
12
Helping Hands Healing Hearts Ministries Inc

HHM Supports children in crisis situations who need a safe refuge assistance an intervention trauma informed care psychosocial support medical help and someone to advocate for their rights.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ketchmore Kids Inc and the most unlike its peers is SwemKids International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20182025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PREVISIO — $357,000 · OtherPREVISIOIndividual grant recipient — $147,162 · OtherIndividual grant recipientATLANTA SEED EQUITY INITIATIVE LLC — $100,000 · OtherATLANTA SEED EQUITY INITIATIVE LLCATLANTA SEED EQUITY INITIATIVE LLC — $100,000 · OtherATLANTA SEED EQUITY INITIATIVE LLCTHE KE'NEKT COOPERATIVE LLC — $34,827 · OtherBLUE IN GREEN CONSULTING GROUP — $32,827 · Other+12 more — $119,125 · Other+12 moreCommunity Movement Builders Inc — $32,827 · Public BenefitRENFORCE — $25,000 · EmploymentKETCHMORE KIDS INC — $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Hopeful Change Project Inc — $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentWii Care Project — $5,500 · Youth DevelopmentORGANIZATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY — $15,000 · Civil RightsCURE VIOLENCE ATLANTA — $6,000 · Human ServicesGIRASSOL WELLNESS INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesSwemKids International Inc — $6,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$890,941Public Benefit$32,827Employment$25,000Youth Development$17,500Civil Rights$15,000Human Services$11,500Recreation & Sports$6,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCommunity Movement Builders Inc — $32,827 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY — $15,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetGIRASSOL WELLNESS INC — $5,500 over 1y, 5.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Community Movement Builders Inc
  • Who funds RENFORCE
  • Who funds ORGANIZATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY
  • Who funds SwemKids International Inc
  • Who funds KETCHMORE KIDS INC
  • Who funds CURE VIOLENCE ATLANTA
  • Who funds The Hopeful Change Project Inc
  • Who funds Wii Care Project
  • Who funds GIRASSOL WELLNESS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Annie E Casey Foundation IncMD14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Edward Charles Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Center for Civic Innovation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Center for Civic Innovation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Center for Civic Innovation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph