Skip to content

· Public charity

Celtic Fc Foundation Inc

Celtic fc foundation continues to uphold and promote the charitable principles and heritage of celtic football club.

$215k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$199kInternational$168kHuman Services$120kFood & Nutrition$30k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $210,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $215,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC$90,000
THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY$90,000
PORCH CHAPEL HILLCARRBORO$10,000
CULTIVATE FOOD RESCUE$10,000
SOME INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $228k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $90k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $70k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $30k → 17%Children's Aid: $19k → 17%The Children's Aid Society: $19k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
2
The Coalition for the Homeless Inc

The coalition's mission is to help transition homeless and at risk individuals and families to self-sufficiency through housing programs and supportive services.

—
3
Central Louisiana Coalition to Prevent Homelessness Inc

To identify, advocate, and mobilize community resources to ensure all people in central louisiana have access to stable homes.

Housing & Shelter
4
Community of Hope

Community of hope's mission is to improve health, end homelessness, and partner with communities to make washington, dc more equitable.

Community Improvement
5
Coralville Community Food Pantry

We believe that food is a human right and that food has the power to bring people together. Our vision is to build a stronger, healthier, and hunger-free Coralville community. Powered by community support, the Coralville Community Food…

Food & Nutrition
6
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
7
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
8
Chatham Outreach Alliance Inc

Cora is a nonprofit working to end hunger by providing nutritious food through its choice pantries, mobile markets, and seasonal programs for kids. cora supports low- and moderate-income residents with dignity and care. last year, cora…

—
9
Colony-South Brooklyn Houses Incorporated

Colony-south brooklyn houses' mission is to offer humanitarian services to the disadvantaged people in the borough of brooklyn, ny. since 1904, colony-south has provided numerous social and educational programs for underprivileged children…

—
10
Central Florida Commission On Homelessness Inc

The corporation is organized for the purpose of permanently reducing the number of homeless individuals and families in the central florida region.

—
11
Compassion Coalition Inc

To serve the underprivileged, the needy, the poor, the afflicted and those lacking opportunity and basic life necessities of affordable food, clothing, housing, transportation, employment and financial needs.

Human Services
12
The Friends of Crown Heights Educational Centers Inc

To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coalition for the Homeless Inc; the most unlike its peers is Co-Operation Ireland Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $228,183 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETYCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $180,000 · OtherCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INCTHE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $18,695 · OtherTHE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INCSOME INC: $10,000 · OtherCO-OPERATION IRELAND INC: $49,853 · InternationalCO-OPERATI…CULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $10,000 · EmploymentPORCH CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO: $10,000 · Food & NutritionTHE INTERNATIONAL CIRCLE OF FRIENDS INC: $10,000 · Education
Human Services$228,183Other$208,695International$49,853Employment$10,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $228,183 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $180,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCO-OPERATION IRELAND INC: $49,853 over 1y, 35% of budgetTHE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $18,695 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPORCH CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL CIRCLE OF FRIENDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Celtic Fc Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Celtic Fc Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Celtic Fc Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Celtic Fc Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Celtic Fc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph