Skip to content
Catanzarite Family Foundation - III at a glance

· Private foundation

Catanzarite Family Foundation - III

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$638kHuman Services$70kEducation$43kReligion$26kYouth Development$20kHousing & Shelter$20kArts & Culture$16kRecreation & Sports$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$229k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS$30,000
STRONGSVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
RONALD MCDONALDS HOUSE$5,000
BLOOD CANCER UNITED$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%BRAIN ANEURYSM FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $5k → 8%WILLS EYE FOUNDATION: $25k → 22%BLOOD CANCER UNITED: $5k → 14%SAINT AMBROSE: $5k → 7%JOA INC: $10k → 9%PELOTONIA: $7k → 15%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $15k → 17%JOURNEY TO THE CURE: $50k → 14%EARS TO YOU: $5k → 7%JOA INC: $5k → 9%ST JOHN CANTIUS CHURCH: $11k → 17%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $10k → 17%HOPE MEADOWS FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%ST JOHN CANTIUS CHURCH: $10k → 17%ST JOHN CANTIUS CHURCH: $5k → 17%VALLEY RIDING INC: $7k → 17%JOHN OWENS ADVENTURE INC: $5k → 17%STRONGSVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%STRONGSVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%STRONGSVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%STRONGSVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%STRONGSVILLE WRESTLING CLUB: $5k → 17%COATS FOR KIDS: $10k → 17%STRONGSVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%CLEVELAND AMERICAN VETERAN'S ASSOCIATION: $20k → 17%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CLEVELAND: $10k → 17%LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $20k → 17%LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $20k → 17%LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $10k → 17%LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $10k → 17%LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $8k → 17%LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $5k → 17%LL S FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $60k → 17%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $30k → 17%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $30k → 17%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $30k → 17%RAINBOW BABIES & CHILDREN: $20k → 17%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $20k → 17%RAINBOW BABIES & CHILDREN: $20k → 17%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $20k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $10k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $7k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $5k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $5k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $5k → 17%RONALD MCDONALDS HOUSE: $5k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$681k · 10 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +201% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
16

Total granted

$681k
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+201%
0%

Still filing today

30%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $25k · revenue +201%
  • P
    PELOTONIA
    2× · 2017–2019 · $8k · revenue +217%
  • JO
    JOHN OWENS ADVENTURE INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $7k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • JT
    JOURNEY TO THE CURE
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • WE
    WILLS EYE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +115%
  • TC
    The Cleveland American Veterans As
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio
Health
2
The Caps Foundation

The caps foundation was founded to raise funds and awareness for breast cancer research and to offer assistance, comfort, and relief to those who are affected by breast cancer.

Philanthropy
3
Ohio Cancer Research Associates

Ohio cancer research is dedicated to the cure and prevention of cancer and the reduction of its debilitating effects by providing critical seed money for groundbreaking research ideas.

Health
4
Cincinnati Shoulder and Elbow Research and Education Foundation Inc
Health
5
Breast Cancer Innovation Foundation

Charitable donations for breast cancer research

Health
6
Beats for a Cure

Funding medical research

Philanthropy
7
Brava

To find a cure for childhood cancer and support the families of children fighting cancer.

Health
8
Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy

To find a cure for epilepsy by promoting and funding patient focused research.

Health
9
Hope for Cleveland's Children
—
10
The Cleveland Eye Bank Foundation

Cleveland Eye Bank Foundation (CEBF) raises funds for research to preserve and restore sight, and to support and deliver community and professional education. CEBF will be recognized for being at the forefront in funding vision research…

—
11
Dayton Clinical Oncology Program Inc

To reduce cancer incidence and mortality through improved treatment and prevention by offering national, state-of-the-art cancer research to local communities.

Health
12
Als United Ohio Inc

The mission of als united ohio is to provide comprehensive support and advocacy for people with als and their families, while advancing research for new treatments and an end to als.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wills Eye Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Susan Stovcik Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEVELAND CLINIC: $260,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINICUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $190,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALSLEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $73,000 · OtherLEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETYJOURNEY TO THE CURE: $50,000 · OtherJOURNEY TO THE CUREStrongsville Schools Foundation: $42,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $37,000 · Other+13 more: $121,500 · Other+13 moreWILLS EYE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationPELOTONIA: $8,000 · EducationVALLEY RIDING INC: $7,000 · HealthJOHN OWENS ADVENTURE INC: $7,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 · HealthEARS TO YOU: $5,000 · HealthTHE BRAIN ANEURYSM FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthThe Cleveland American Veterans As: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterSusan Stovcik Memorial Foundation: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$814,000Education$33,000Health$29,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetStrongsville Schools Foundation: $42,500 over 5y, 21% of budgetWILLS EYE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Cleveland American Veterans As: $20,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CLEVELAND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHope Meadows Foundation: $9,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetVALLEY RIDING INC: $7,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetJOHN OWENS ADVENTURE INC: $7,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARS TO YOU: $5,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetTHE BRAIN ANEURYSM FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCentral Ohio Crime Stoppers Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSusan Stovcik Memorial Foundation: $500 over 1y, 8.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Strongsville Schools Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WILLS EYE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Cleveland American Veterans As ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds Hope Meadows Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PELOTONIA ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN OWENS ADVENTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds EARS TO YOU ↗
  • Who funds THE BRAIN ANEURYSM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Ohio Crime Stoppers Inc ↗
  • Who funds Susan Stovcik Memorial Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Catanzarite Family Foundation - III funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Catanzarite Family Foundation - III. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Catanzarite Family Foundation - III’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home