Skip to content
Casualty Actuarial Society at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Casualty Actuarial Society

See schedule o.the purposes of the CASUALTY ACTUARIAL SOCIETY are to advance the body of knowledge of actuarial science applied to general insurance, including property, casualty and similar risk exposures; to expand the application of actuarial science to enterprise risk and systemic risks; to establish and maintain standards of…

$664k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$696kHealth$240kCommunity Improvement$95kHuman Services$60kScience & Tech$7k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $323,446, the rows itemized in this filing. The $664,189 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $340,743 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $72k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $205k
$8,100
Median grant
8
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION$140,000
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK ACTUARIES$65,000
ORGANIZATION OF LATINO ACTUARIES$22,500
PINNACLE ACTUARIAL RESOURCES INC$22,500
NATIONAL COLLEGE RESOURCES FOUNDATION$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-DALLAS$11,667
AMERICAN INDIAN SCIENCE ENGINEERING SOCIETY$8,100
STEM MUSE PBC LLC$7,500
UMCES (UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE)$7,428
SOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS$7,000
MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY$5,993
NATIONAL SOCIETY OF BLACK ENGINEERS$5,575
ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY$5,183
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ORGANIZATION OF LATINO ACTUARIES: $20k → 14%ORGANIZATION OF LATINO ACTUARIES: $23k → 14%ORGANIZATION OF LATINO ACTUARIES: $20k → 14%ORGANIZATION OF LATINO ACTUARIES: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
MD
TN
AL
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $519k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $461k to organizations and $59k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$236k · 45% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: RESEARCH

North America (Canada and Mexico)$175k · 34% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: RESEARCH

East Asia and the Pacific$73k · 14% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: RESEARCH

Middle East and North Africa$15k · 3%

Stated purpose: RESEARCH

Sub-Saharan Africa$11k · 2% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH

South Asia$10k · 2% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 8 repeat orgs$293k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +114% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$1.1M
$221k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+114%
0%

Still filing today

63%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $769k · revenue +159%
  • OO
    Organization of Latino Actuaries
    4× · 2022–2025 · $83k · revenue +114%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $55k · revenue +151%

Funded once

  • OL
    OCTAGRAM LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • RR
    RISK & REGULATORY CONSULTING
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
  • NO
    Network of Actuarial Women and Allies
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girls in Stem
Human Services
2
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
3
American Association of State Colleges and Universities

Aascu is a washington, d.c. based higher education association that represents the sector of over 500 regional public colleges, universities, and systems whose members share a learning and teaching centered culture, a commitment to…

Education
4
National Society of Professional Engineers

To foster licensed professional engineers in service to society.

—
5
Association for Computing Machinery Inc

We are an intl. scientific & educational org. dedicated to advancing art, science & technology.

Science & Tech
6
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
7
National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering Inc

To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of successful african american, native american and latinx women and men in engineering and technology, math, and science-based careers.

Civil Rights
8
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

To advance the arts, sciences, and technology of aeronautics and astronautics and to nurture and promote the professionalism of those engaged in these pursuits. the institute encourages original research, fosters dissemination of new…

—
9
National Association of College and University Business Officers

The usual public activitites of the national association of college and univsersity business officers (nacubo) are to develop, promote, and improve business and financial principles and practices in the administration of institutions of…

—
10
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology Inc

Abet serves the public through the promotion and advancement of education in applied natural science, computing, engineering, and engineering technology.

Education
11
Institute of Asian Scholars

naisA Global is a 501(c)(3) non-profit educational organization dedicated to helping talented young Asian professionals unlock their potential and become great leaders. It is the only non-profit of its kind to provide a global platform to…

—
12
American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers

To advance and support a richly diverse, globally interconnected community of higher education professionals as well as the institutions, organizations, and learners they serve through its resources, leadership, and advocacy.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Association of Black Actuaries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bentley University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION: $769,038 · EducationTHE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATIONNetwork of Actuarial Women and Allies: $35,000 · Education+3 more: $33,000 · EducationSOCIETY OF ACTUARIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $54,500 · OtherSOCIETY OF ACTUARIES RESEA…OCTAGRAM LLC: $50,000 · OtherOCTAGRAM LLCRISK & REGULATORY CONSULTING: $35,100 · OtherRISK & REGULATORY CONSULTI…INSURANCE INFORMATION INSTITUTE INC: $30,000 · OtherINSURANCE INFORMATION INST…PINNACLE ACTUARIAL RESOURCES INC: $22,500 · OtherPINNACLE ACTUARIAL RESOURC…BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $19,025 · OtherBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ILLIN…UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-DALLAS: $17,500 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $16,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $14,856 · OtherMILLIMAN: $12,500 · OtherMIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY: $11,250 · Other+6 more: $46,593 · Other+6 moreINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK ACTUARIES INC: $160,000 · Community ImprovementINTERNATIONAL…SOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS: $7,000 · Community ImprovementOrganization of Latino Actuaries: $82,500 · Human ServicesNational Society of Black Engineers: $5,575 · Science & Tech
Education$837,038Other$329,824Community Improvement$167,000Human Services$82,500Science & Tech$5,575

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION: $769,038 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK ACTUARIES INC: $160,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetOrganization of Latino Actuaries: $82,500 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetSOCIETY OF ACTUARIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $54,500 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetNetwork of Actuarial Women and Allies: $35,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetINSURANCE INFORMATION INSTITUTE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBENTLEY UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Society of Black Engineers: $5,575 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK ACTUARIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Organization of Latino Actuaries ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Network of Actuarial Women and Allies ↗
  • Who funds INSURANCE INFORMATION INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COLLEGE RESOURCES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BENTLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ↗
  • Who funds National Society of Black Engineers ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Society of Actuaries …American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
Society of Actuaries Research InstituteIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Society of Actuaries Research Institute · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Casualty Actuarial Society funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Casualty Actuarial Society. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Bentley University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Casualty Actuarial Society’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home