· Public charity
Casualty Actuarial Society
See schedule o.the purposes of the CASUALTY ACTUARIAL SOCIETY are to advance the body of knowledge of actuarial science applied to general insurance, including property, casualty and similar risk exposures; to expand the application of actuarial science to enterprise risk and systemic risks; to establish and maintain standards of…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $272,933 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $631,302 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $358,369 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $183k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OCTAGRAM LLC | $50,000 |
| THE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| RISK & REGULATORY CONSULTING LLC | $35,100 |
| NETWORK OF ACTUARIAL WOMEN AND ALLIES | $35,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK ACTUARIES | $32,500 |
| ORGANIZATION OF LATINO ACTUARIES | $20,000 |
| STEM MUSE PBC LLC | $10,000 |
| SOA RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| GUY CARPENTER & COMPANY LLC | $8,333 |
| ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY | $7,500 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA | $6,667 |
| SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS | $6,000 |
| BENTLEY UNIVERSITY | $6,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-DALLAS | $5,833 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $338k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $248k to organizations and $90k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: RESEARCH
Stated purpose: RESEARCH
Stated purpose: RESEARCH
Stated purpose: RESEARCH
Stated purpose: RESEARCH
Stated purpose: RESEARCH
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +114% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $157k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATHE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $629k · revenue +159%
- OOOrganization of Latino Actuaries3× · 2022–2024 · $60k · revenue +114%
- SOSOCIETY OF ACTUARIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE2× · 2023–2024 · $55k · revenue +151%
Funded once
- IIINSURANCE INFORMATION INSTITUTE INCone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -3%
- TOTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $16k
- MMILLIMANone grant, 2023 · $13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We are an intl. scientific & educational org. dedicated to advancing art, science & technology.
Aascu is a washington, d.c. based higher education association that represents the sector of over 500 regional public colleges, universities, and systems whose members share a learning and teaching centered culture, a commitment to…
The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…
Founded in the Year 2006, the Association of Asian American Investment Managers AAAIM is a national trade association dedicated to the advance of AAPIs Asian Americans & Pacific-Islanders in the asset management industry. AAAIM supports…
To advance the arts, sciences, and technology of aeronautics and astronautics and to nurture and promote the professionalism of those engaged in these pursuits. the institute encourages original research, fosters dissemination of new…
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
Industry Studies Association seeks to advance Industry Studies scholarship by facilitating the exchange of ideas among its members and between its members and the public. These activities bring together scholars from many academic…
The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.
Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.
Aria is a scholarly association devoted to the study of and promotion of risk and insurance economics. our membership is comprised of academics, scholars, professionals and industry veterans. together, through conferences, publications,…
The usual public activitites of the national association of college and univsersity business officers (nacubo) are to develop, promote, and improve business and financial principles and practices in the administration of institutions of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Association of Black Actuaries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bentley University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK ACTUARIES INC ↗
- Who funds Organization of Latino Actuaries ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Network of Actuarial Women and Allies ↗
- Who funds INSURANCE INFORMATION INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds BENTLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Society of Actuaries Research Institute · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Casualty Actuarial Society funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bentley University — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.