Skip to content

Minnesota · Public charity

Cassia Services

To provide support to its beneficiary organizations that provide health care, housing, and community services for the elderly.

$479k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
3
Organizations funded FY2022
100%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2022
$118,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$309,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 3
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
1
Total assets, FY2022
$34M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 100% of the organizations Cassia Services funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20223$475k100%
FY20172$799kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$1.3M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Augustana Care$775,97812%
Newton Village Inc$309,00015%
Elim Shores Inc$118,00016%
Country Meadow of Milaca Inc$48,00013%
Augustana Senior Development$22,7631n/a

Compare Cassia Services with peer funders

About Cassia Services

How much does Cassia Services give?
Cassia Services reported 3 grants totaling $479,295 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 3 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does Cassia Services fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2022, its largest causes are Human Services (100%).
Who are Cassia Services's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2022: Augustana Care ($776k), Newton Village Inc ($309k), Elim Shores Inc ($118k).
Does Cassia Services fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Cassia Services based?
Cassia Services is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cassia Services’ filings →

More from the funding graph